Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27741 - 27750 of 63317 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 27741 - 27750 of 63317 for Motion for joint custody.
COURT OF APPEALS
in denying his motion to suppress that evidence. We conclude that there was no reasonable suspicion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108029 - 2014-02-12
in denying his motion to suppress that evidence. We conclude that there was no reasonable suspicion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108029 - 2014-02-12
COURT OF APPEALS
representation, among other things. ¶3 Ricciardi filed a motion for summary judgment, together
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36186 - 2009-04-15
representation, among other things. ¶3 Ricciardi filed a motion for summary judgment, together
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36186 - 2009-04-15
COURT OF APPEALS
of an inadvertent mistake. Legacy did not present affidavits or offer testimony to support its motions.[2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86294 - 2012-08-20
of an inadvertent mistake. Legacy did not present affidavits or offer testimony to support its motions.[2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86294 - 2012-08-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and an order of the circuit court for Jefferson County denying his motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=416175 - 2021-08-26
and an order of the circuit court for Jefferson County denying his motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=416175 - 2021-08-26
[PDF]
NOTICE
things. ¶3 Ricciardi filed a motion for summary judgment, together with the February 9, 2007
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36186 - 2014-09-15
things. ¶3 Ricciardi filed a motion for summary judgment, together with the February 9, 2007
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36186 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
a motion to withdraw because the court indicated it would not be willing to allow her to withdraw
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41635 - 2009-09-30
a motion to withdraw because the court indicated it would not be willing to allow her to withdraw
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41635 - 2009-09-30
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Judge. William Bransford, pro se, appeals an order denying his postconviction motion for permission
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141073 - 2017-09-21
Judge. William Bransford, pro se, appeals an order denying his postconviction motion for permission
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141073 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
denying his motion for postconviction relief. Schlemm seeks resentencing on grounds that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93052 - 2013-02-25
denying his motion for postconviction relief. Schlemm seeks resentencing on grounds that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93052 - 2013-02-25
MMart, LLC, v. Dale Steger
motion after verdict, Metal Mart sought a new trial or a change in jury answers in the interest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7056 - 2005-03-31
motion after verdict, Metal Mart sought a new trial or a change in jury answers in the interest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7056 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
postconviction motions. Haas claims that his due-process rights were violated when: (1) an out-of-court show-up
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32212 - 2008-03-24
postconviction motions. Haas claims that his due-process rights were violated when: (1) an out-of-court show-up
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32212 - 2008-03-24