Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27741 - 27750 of 65586 for divorce records/1000.
Search results 27741 - 27750 of 65586 for divorce records/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
erroneously exercised its discretion at sentencing. Based on our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=124672 - 2017-09-21
erroneously exercised its discretion at sentencing. Based on our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=124672 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Alan R. Lulloff v. Wisconsin Personnel Commission
substantial evidence exists in the record to support the commission’s factual NO. 96-2189 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11187 - 2017-09-19
substantial evidence exists in the record to support the commission’s factual NO. 96-2189 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11187 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Gabriel J. Alwin
our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10864 - 2017-09-20
our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10864 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and records, this court concludes that no issue of arguable merit could be raised on appeal and affirms
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231043 - 2018-12-27
and records, this court concludes that no issue of arguable merit could be raised on appeal and affirms
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231043 - 2018-12-27
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not filed a response. Upon independently reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=945983 - 2025-04-24
not filed a response. Upon independently reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=945983 - 2025-04-24
CA Blank Order
right to respond to the report and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104957 - 2013-12-02
right to respond to the report and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104957 - 2013-12-02
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Having independently reviewed the entire record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1082482 - 2026-02-24
. Having independently reviewed the entire record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1082482 - 2026-02-24
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Having independently reviewed the entire record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1082482 - 2026-02-24
. Having independently reviewed the entire record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1082482 - 2026-02-24
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
its discretion when it imposed a DNA surcharge. Based upon our review of the briefs and record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171226 - 2017-09-21
its discretion when it imposed a DNA surcharge. Based upon our review of the briefs and record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171226 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the report and conducting an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=443146 - 2021-10-19
the report and conducting an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=443146 - 2021-10-19