Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27751 - 27760 of 29832 for des.

[PDF] NOTICE
review questions of statutory interpretation de novo. State v. Stenklyft, 2005 WI 71, ¶¶7, 11, 281 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32345 - 2014-09-15

State v. John C. Setagord
. The interpretation of a statute presents a question of law, which we decide de novo. See State v. Eichman, 155 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8543 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. William Carpenter
) to an undisputed set of facts. These are questions of law that we review de novo. See Swatek v. County
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16927 - 2017-09-21

State v. Mustafa M. Mohammad
the defendant was prejudiced are questions of law, which we review de novo. …. Deficient performance means
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14205 - 2005-03-31

Wisconsin Patients Compensation Fund v. St. Mary's Hospital of Milwaukee
the interpretation and application of Chapter 655, Stats., thus presenting questions of law which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10029 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Michael Love
of law which an appellate court reviews de novo. State v. Cobbs, 221 Wis. 2d 101, 105, 584 N.W.2d
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17295 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
of constitutional principles to those facts is reviewed de novo. Id. B. Community Caretaker Exception ¶12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132150 - 2014-12-22

State v. Kelley L. Hauk
. APPEAL from judgments and orders of the circuit court for Grant County: robert p. van de hey, Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4096 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
). Questions of statutory interpretation are questions of law that we review de novo. See Zellner v. Cedarburg
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143972 - 2015-07-06

[PDF] Aldene Kannenberg v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
. Kannenberg argues that we should give no weight to LIRC’s interpretation of the statute, employing a de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12003 - 2017-09-21