Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27751 - 27760 of 29713 for des.

2009 WI APP 140
and affirm. ¶14 “The interpretation of a statute is a question of law which we review de novo.” Grosse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39214 - 2009-09-28

State v. Shon D. Brown
interpretation subject to our de novo review. See State v. Gribble, 2001 WI App 227, ¶¶26-27 n.10, ¶31, 248 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5151 - 2005-03-31

University of Wisconsin Medical Foundation, Inc. v. City of Madison
judgment de novo, owing no deference to the trial court’s decision. Waters v. United States Fid. & Guar
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5309 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Daniel Anderson
violated is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. See State v. Sauceda, 168 Wis. 2d 486
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17082 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
in the Green Bay area consisting of nine primary and secondary schools. Alex attended Notre Dame in De
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=595501 - 2022-11-29

Village of Trempealeau v. Mike R. Mikrut
that we review de novo. Kywanda F., 200 Wis. 2d at 32-33. III. DISCUSSION ¶8 Article VII
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16758 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Peter G. Tkacz
rights involves a question of law which this court reviews de novo. See id. at 6. “A defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12308 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI APP 56
the application of constitutional principles to those facts de novo. State v. Grady, 2009 WI 47, ¶13, 317 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48057 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
on the expectations of the ultimate user or consumer. See Godoy v. E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Co., 2009 WI 78, ¶41
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64000 - 2014-09-15

Village of Trempealeau v. Mike R. Mikrut
that we review de novo. Kywanda F., 200 Wis. 2d at 32-33. III. DISCUSSION ¶8 Article VII
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16756 - 2005-03-31