Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27751 - 27760 of 29832 for des.

The Manor Enterprises, Inc. v. Vivid, Inc.
as the trial court, and we consider the issues de novo. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis.2d 304, 315
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14152 - 2005-03-31

State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
to the defendant are questions of law reviewed by this court de novo. Id.; State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d 628, 634
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17518 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
in the law presents a legal question to be reviewed de novo. State ex rel. Robinson v. Town of Bristol
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=347156 - 2021-03-18

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, 695 N.W.2d 277. The application of constitutional principles to those facts is reviewed de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132150 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
constitutes ineffective assistance is a question of law, which we review de novo.” Id. A. Golden rule
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1043058 - 2025-11-25

[PDF] State v. Gerald P.
limits of § 48.422(2), is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. Matthew S., 282 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20442 - 2017-09-21

Sea View Estates Beach Club, Inc. v. State of Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources
weight” or “de novo.” See Knight, 220 Wis.2d at 147, 582 N.W.2d at 453; Harnischfeger Corp. v. LIRC, 196
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13303 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
N.W.2d 687 (1996). In Wisconsin, we review those determinations de novo. See id. at 18
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39505 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Shon D. Brown
a question of statutory interpretation subject to our de novo review. See State v. Gribble, 2001 WI App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5151 - 2017-09-19

State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
to the defendant are questions of law reviewed by this court de novo. Id.; State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d 628, 634
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17520 - 2005-03-31