Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27761 - 27770 of 63339 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 27761 - 27770 of 63339 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
Ray A. Peterson v. Mark Baker
. NOWAKOWSKI, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 ROGGENSACK, J.1 Ray Peterson appeals an order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5501 - 2017-09-19
. NOWAKOWSKI, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 ROGGENSACK, J.1 Ray Peterson appeals an order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5501 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Lutheran Church Extension Fund - Missouri Synod v. Epiphany Lutheran Church
filed a motion for summary judgment against both Epiphany and TCI. ¶7 At a November 20, 2000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3718 - 2017-09-19
filed a motion for summary judgment against both Epiphany and TCI. ¶7 At a November 20, 2000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3718 - 2017-09-19
Ray A. Peterson v. Mark Baker
denying his motion to reopen a default judgment entered against him in a small claims action. Peterson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5501 - 2005-03-31
denying his motion to reopen a default judgment entered against him in a small claims action. Peterson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5501 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the default finding was raised, Mandy’s attorney was told to file a motion to reopen. Mandy
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132562 - 2017-09-21
the default finding was raised, Mandy’s attorney was told to file a motion to reopen. Mandy
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132562 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
dismissing this action for lack of standing and granting the respondents’ motion for monetary and non
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115301 - 2014-06-19
dismissing this action for lack of standing and granting the respondents’ motion for monetary and non
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115301 - 2014-06-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and other related defendants filed a motion in the circuit court to discharge a lis pendens filed by Kurtz
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=791677 - 2024-04-24
and other related defendants filed a motion in the circuit court to discharge a lis pendens filed by Kurtz
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=791677 - 2024-04-24
COURT OF APPEALS
of two witnesses. Following an evidentiary hearing, the trial court denied the motion, ruling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32439 - 2008-04-14
of two witnesses. Following an evidentiary hearing, the trial court denied the motion, ruling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32439 - 2008-04-14
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
postconviction motion. His appellate counsel filed a no-merit report pursuant to WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32 (2023
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=970552 - 2025-06-18
postconviction motion. His appellate counsel filed a no-merit report pursuant to WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32 (2023
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=970552 - 2025-06-18
COURT OF APPEALS
also appeals from a postconviction order denying his motion to modify his sentence. On appeal, Mayer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74191 - 2012-01-22
also appeals from a postconviction order denying his motion to modify his sentence. On appeal, Mayer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74191 - 2012-01-22
COURT OF APPEALS
is in Adams’ best interest. The circuit court held a hearing on the motion and heard the parties’ arguments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93778 - 2013-03-06
is in Adams’ best interest. The circuit court held a hearing on the motion and heard the parties’ arguments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93778 - 2013-03-06