Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27761 - 27770 of 29966 for de.
Search results 27761 - 27770 of 29966 for de.
[PDF]
Joan La Rock v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
in the area of Indian taxation, de novo review is appropriate because there is no evidence that the agency
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17500 - 2017-09-21
in the area of Indian taxation, de novo review is appropriate because there is no evidence that the agency
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17500 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. James M. Evers
; Franklin, 111 Wis.2d at 687-88, 331 N.W.2d at 637. This court's de novo review is aided by the fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13979 - 2014-09-15
; Franklin, 111 Wis.2d at 687-88, 331 N.W.2d at 637. This court's de novo review is aided by the fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13979 - 2014-09-15
wi APP 62 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2012AP1047 Complete Title of...
to LIRC’s decisions: great weight, due weight, or no weight (de novo review). Racine Harley-Davidson, Inc
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94693 - 2013-05-28
to LIRC’s decisions: great weight, due weight, or no weight (de novo review). Racine Harley-Davidson, Inc
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94693 - 2013-05-28
State v. Brian D. Robins
review de novo. State v. Jensen, 2000 WI 84, ¶12, 236 Wis. 2d 521, 613 N.W.2d 170. The sufficiency
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16431 - 2005-03-31
review de novo. State v. Jensen, 2000 WI 84, ¶12, 236 Wis. 2d 521, 613 N.W.2d 170. The sufficiency
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16431 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
reviews de novo. See Outagamie County v. Melanie L., 2013 WI 67, ¶39, 349 Wis. 2d 148, 833 N.W.2d 607
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=704579 - 2023-09-20
reviews de novo. See Outagamie County v. Melanie L., 2013 WI 67, ¶39, 349 Wis. 2d 148, 833 N.W.2d 607
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=704579 - 2023-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Marvin L. Hereford
decide de novo without deference to the trial court's determination. See Tahtinen v. MSI Ins. Co., 122
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7922 - 2017-09-19
decide de novo without deference to the trial court's determination. See Tahtinen v. MSI Ins. Co., 122
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7922 - 2017-09-19
State v. Ronald L. Ragan
review de novo. Id. at 634, 369 N.W.2d at 715. With these standards in mind, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10347 - 2005-03-31
review de novo. Id. at 634, 369 N.W.2d at 715. With these standards in mind, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10347 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Antonio V. Blanco
it passes statutory and constitutional muster are questions of law subject to de novo review.” Id. at 137
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14735 - 2017-09-21
it passes statutory and constitutional muster are questions of law subject to de novo review.” Id. at 137
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14735 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
failed to follow statutory requirements in making an assessment is a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=397273 - 2021-07-28
failed to follow statutory requirements in making an assessment is a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=397273 - 2021-07-28
[PDF]
State v. Teresa L. Bellows
this court decides de novo without deference to the decision of the trial court. See Rolo v. Goers, 174
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12309 - 2017-09-21
this court decides de novo without deference to the decision of the trial court. See Rolo v. Goers, 174
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12309 - 2017-09-21