Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27771 - 27780 of 29957 for de.

[PDF] WI APP 38
to dismiss is de novo. The Department points to Data Key Partners v. Permira Advisers, LLC, 2014 WI 86
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=673269 - 2023-08-08

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
a postconviction court’s decision to deny a postconviction motion without an evidentiary hearing under the de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191575 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Gregory L.S.
and 48.31. ¶30 Statutory interpretation is a question of law that we decide de novo. Minuteman, Inc
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4342 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
.2d 687 (1996). In Wisconsin, we review those determinations de novo. See id. at 18. The State also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39505 - 2009-08-17

State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
to the defendant are questions of law reviewed by this court de novo. Id.; State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d 628, 634
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17516 - 2005-03-31

Wayne A. Briesemeister v. Philip Lehner
de novo, applying the same method as the trial court. Green Spring Farms, 136 Wis. 2d at 315
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25691 - 2006-07-26

2007 WI APP 146
principles to those facts de novo.” Id. (citations omitted). ¶8 In reviewing whether probable cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28959 - 2007-06-26

Tina M. Busch v. Margaret O'Connor
that it constituted a de facto deportation. ¶16 Although in State ex rel. Halverson v. Young, 154 N.W.2d 699
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4976 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] City of Madison v. State of Wisconsin Department of Workforce Development
that we review de novo. See State ex rel. DPI v. DILHR, 68 Wis. 2d 677, 680-84, 229 N.W.2d 591, 593-95
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4190 - 2017-09-19

State v. Kelley L. Hauk
. APPEAL from judgments and orders of the circuit court for Grant County: robert p. van de hey, Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4097 - 2005-03-31