Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27771 - 27780 of 29713 for des.
Search results 27771 - 27780 of 29713 for des.
[PDF]
State v. Gerald P.
limits of § 48.422(2), is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. Matthew S., 282 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20442 - 2017-09-21
limits of § 48.422(2), is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. Matthew S., 282 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20442 - 2017-09-21
State v. Tony M. Smith
breached the terms of the plea agreement is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Wills, 193
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16976 - 2005-03-31
breached the terms of the plea agreement is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Wills, 193
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16976 - 2005-03-31
State v. Peter G. Tkacz
jeopardy rights involves a question of law which this court reviews de novo. See id. at 6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12308 - 2005-03-31
jeopardy rights involves a question of law which this court reviews de novo. See id. at 6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12308 - 2005-03-31
State v. Dennis H.
to this court. II ¶12 The constitutionality of a statute is a question of law which this court reviews de
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16477 - 2005-03-31
to this court. II ¶12 The constitutionality of a statute is a question of law which this court reviews de
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16477 - 2005-03-31
State v. Tony M. Smith
breached the terms of the plea agreement is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Wills, 193
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16975 - 2005-03-31
breached the terms of the plea agreement is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Wills, 193
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16975 - 2005-03-31
State v. Mustafa M. Mohammad
the defendant was prejudiced are questions of law, which we review de novo. …. Deficient performance means
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14205 - 2005-03-31
the defendant was prejudiced are questions of law, which we review de novo. …. Deficient performance means
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14205 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 20, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
. Gardner v. Gardner, 190 Wis. 2d 216, 240, 527 N.W.2d 701 (Ct. App. 1994). Accordingly, we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27484 - 2006-12-19
. Gardner v. Gardner, 190 Wis. 2d 216, 240, 527 N.W.2d 701 (Ct. App. 1994). Accordingly, we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27484 - 2006-12-19
WI App 49 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2014AP2238-CR Complete Title...
which we review de novo[.]” Id. (citations omitted). ¶24 The circuit court concluded the State had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141620 - 2015-06-23
which we review de novo[.]” Id. (citations omitted). ¶24 The circuit court concluded the State had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141620 - 2015-06-23
[PDF]
State v. Daniel G. Scheidell
to present a defense was violated is, however, a question of “constitutional fact” that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12489 - 2017-09-21
to present a defense was violated is, however, a question of “constitutional fact” that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12489 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI App 48
, our review is de novo, and we owe no deference to the circuit court. Yahnke v. Carson, 2000 WI 74
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=382518 - 2021-08-19
, our review is de novo, and we owe no deference to the circuit court. Yahnke v. Carson, 2000 WI 74
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=382518 - 2021-08-19