Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27781 - 27790 of 62778 for child support.
Search results 27781 - 27790 of 62778 for child support.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
allowing a police dog to sniff the outside of his residence for the presence of drugs was not supported
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212773 - 2018-05-15
allowing a police dog to sniff the outside of his residence for the presence of drugs was not supported
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212773 - 2018-05-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
affidavit in support of the warrant sought to search the premises for “[m]arijuana, and/or other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209242 - 2018-03-07
affidavit in support of the warrant sought to search the premises for “[m]arijuana, and/or other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209242 - 2018-03-07
State v. Johnny W. Williams
the effective assistance of trial and appellate counsel, that there was insufficient evidence to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13208 - 2005-03-31
the effective assistance of trial and appellate counsel, that there was insufficient evidence to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13208 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
) there was insufficient evidence at the preliminary hearing to support the charge; (3) the district attorney failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49227 - 2010-04-21
) there was insufficient evidence at the preliminary hearing to support the charge; (3) the district attorney failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49227 - 2010-04-21
State v. Joseph P. Sutherland
(1)(a). Sutherland argues that: (1) the evidence presented by the State was insufficient to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2554 - 2005-03-31
(1)(a). Sutherland argues that: (1) the evidence presented by the State was insufficient to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2554 - 2005-03-31
State v. Johnny W. Williams
the effective assistance of trial and appellate counsel, that there was insufficient evidence to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13209 - 2005-03-31
the effective assistance of trial and appellate counsel, that there was insufficient evidence to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13209 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
authority supporting his contention. He quotes only a 1924 Texas case, and omits from his quotation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142162 - 2017-09-21
authority supporting his contention. He quotes only a 1924 Texas case, and omits from his quotation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142162 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
to support the verdict; and (8) Jackson’s prosecution violated his right to be free from double jeopardy. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69079 - 2011-08-03
to support the verdict; and (8) Jackson’s prosecution violated his right to be free from double jeopardy. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69079 - 2011-08-03
[PDF]
State v. Lamardus D. Ford
was charged: (1) exceeded the scope of a Terry1 pat down, and (2) was not supported by probable cause. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11512 - 2017-09-19
was charged: (1) exceeded the scope of a Terry1 pat down, and (2) was not supported by probable cause. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11512 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
understanding and agreement that a factual basis supported his pleas: THE COURT: Mr. Freeman, as to the July
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175263 - 2017-09-21
understanding and agreement that a factual basis supported his pleas: THE COURT: Mr. Freeman, as to the July
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175263 - 2017-09-21