Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27791 - 27800 of 38217 for ph d.

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 30, 2009 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court of Appe...
to collaterally attack his conviction in a state habeas corpus proceeding. Id. See 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1) and (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38618 - 2009-07-29

[PDF] Karen Wipperfurth v. Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System
are “academic staff” in the UW system. Section 230.08(2)(d). “‘Academic staff’ means professional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11968 - 2017-09-21

2009 WI APP 8
on the brief of James D. Peebles of Selsing Law Office, Berlin. No brief was filed by respondent. 2009 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34987 - 2009-01-27

[PDF] NOTICE
effect. I don’t think it’s anything near mistrial status, I don’t think, because it’s a concede[d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39960 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Willow Creek Ranch, L.L.C. v. Town of Shelby
corporation counsel of La Crosse, and Bradley D. Armstrong, Steven A. Brezinski and Rita M. Knauss of Axley
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13526 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
1 This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(d) (2019-20). All
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=611232 - 2023-01-18

[PDF] J.L. Phillips & Associates, Inc. v. E & H Plastic Corporation
of an adverse party; (d) The judgment is void; (e) The judgment has been satisfied, released
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17178 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI APP 22
], but there [were] certain charges contained in [the] bills which [Gateway] decline[d] to stipulate to given
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44187 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
-year term of imprisonment and a $10,000 fine, see WIS. STAT. § 941.20(1)(d), 939.51(3)(a), 939.62(1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=260817 - 2020-05-19

[PDF] WI App 48
was not prejudiced. No. 2008AP910-CR 16 D. Inconsistencies in the Witnesses’ Descriptions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35764 - 2014-09-15