Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2781 - 2790 of 4343 for bd.

[PDF] NOTICE
question is whether the agency’s decision is reasonable.” Jackson v. Employe Trust Funds Bd., 230 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31860 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] NOTICE
. v. Wisconsin Racing Bd., 157 Wis. 2d 678, 693-94, 460 N.W.2d 802 (Ct. App. 1990); see also Hull v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30297 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
under even the greatest level of deference. See Citizens’ Util. Bd. v. PSC, 211 Wis. 2d 537, 552-53
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89796 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Badger III Limited Partnership v. Howard
. See Bufkin v. Milwaukee Bd. of School Directors, 179 Wis.2d 228, 233, 507 N.W.2d 571, 573-574 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8289 - 2017-09-19

Charles A. Kramer v. Board of Education of the School District of the Menomonie Area
review de novo. See Handicapped Children’s Educ. Bd. v. Lukaszewski, 112 Wis. 2d 197, 206-07, 332 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3431 - 2005-03-31

Alexander L. Jacobus v. State
Dist. v. Department of Pub. Instruction Sch. Dist. Boundary Appeal Bd., 202 Wis. 2d 214, 225, 550 N.W
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16966 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] William W. Welter v. City of Milwaukee
rel. Brelsford v. Retirement Bd. of the Policemen's Annuity & Benefit Fund, 41 Wis.2d 77, 163 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11483 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
is equivalent Nos. 2013AP420-CRNM 2013AP636-CRNM 7 to a plea of guilty.” Lee v. State Bd
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103238 - 2017-09-21

George Johnson v. City of Edgerton
, "that the legislature chose its terms carefully and precisely to express its meaning." Ball v. District No. 4, Area Bd
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10612 - 2005-03-31

John Hahn v. Town of Trenton Zoning Board of Appeals
, we review the decision of the agency, not the circuit court. Tateoka v. City of Waukesha Bd
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5408 - 2005-03-31