Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27801 - 27810 of 29966 for de.
Search results 27801 - 27810 of 29966 for de.
[PDF]
WI App 20
and the meaning of an unambiguous deed are questions of law that we review de novo.” Garrett v. O’Dowd, 2009 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=776404 - 2024-05-08
and the meaning of an unambiguous deed are questions of law that we review de novo.” Garrett v. O’Dowd, 2009 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=776404 - 2024-05-08
State v. Ronald L. Ragan
review de novo. Id. at 634, 369 N.W.2d at 715. With these standards in mind, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10347 - 2005-03-31
review de novo. Id. at 634, 369 N.W.2d at 715. With these standards in mind, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10347 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Antonio V. Blanco
it passes statutory and constitutional muster are questions of law subject to de novo review.” Id. at 137
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14735 - 2017-09-21
it passes statutory and constitutional muster are questions of law subject to de novo review.” Id. at 137
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14735 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
failed to follow statutory requirements in making an assessment is a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=397273 - 2021-07-28
failed to follow statutory requirements in making an assessment is a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=397273 - 2021-07-28
[PDF]
State v. Teresa L. Bellows
this court decides de novo without deference to the decision of the trial court. See Rolo v. Goers, 174
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12309 - 2017-09-21
this court decides de novo without deference to the decision of the trial court. See Rolo v. Goers, 174
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12309 - 2017-09-21
State v. Sally Ann Minniecheske
counsel's performance was deficient and prejudicial are questions of law we review de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14119 - 2005-03-31
counsel's performance was deficient and prejudicial are questions of law we review de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14119 - 2005-03-31
State v. Robert Jamont Wright
for ineffective assistance of counsel is a question of law which we review de novo. Id. Van Rybroek’s Expert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6103 - 2005-03-31
for ineffective assistance of counsel is a question of law which we review de novo. Id. Van Rybroek’s Expert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6103 - 2005-03-31
Raymond Allen v. Elizabeth Snider Allen
, which we review de novo. Id. ¶36 A claim is not frivolous merely because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15386 - 2005-03-31
, which we review de novo. Id. ¶36 A claim is not frivolous merely because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15386 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
. 1994). Accordingly, we review de novo the trial court’s threshold determination of whether given
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27484 - 2014-09-15
. 1994). Accordingly, we review de novo the trial court’s threshold determination of whether given
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27484 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a postconviction court’s decision to deny a postconviction motion without an evidentiary hearing under the de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191575 - 2017-09-21
a postconviction court’s decision to deny a postconviction motion without an evidentiary hearing under the de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191575 - 2017-09-21