Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27801 - 27810 of 55848 for n y c.

COURT OF APPEALS
was prejudicial. C. Failure to interview alibi witnesses ¶14 McFarland next argues that trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29130 - 2007-06-26

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
“[c]ommencing at a point on the Westerly line [2] of County Trunk Highway ‘I’ as now traveled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131444 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
“Additionally, ‘[c]ounsel’s decisions in choosing a trial strategy are to be given great deference.’” State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=907454 - 2025-01-29

2008 WI APP 39
. 66.0703(8)(c) (emphasis added). Finally, “[w]hen the final resolution is published, all work
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31861 - 2008-03-18

COURT OF APPEALS
] Therefore, we need not address this issue further. See State v. Lindell, 2000 WI App 180, ¶23 n.8, 238 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32214 - 2008-03-25

William W. Marquardt v. Milwaukee County
, 171 Wis. 2d 627, 646, 492 N.W.2d 633 (Ct. App. 1992). C. The Weinhagen rule does not apply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3557 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
County: MICHAEL N. NOWAKOWSKI, Judge. Reversed and cause remanded with directions. ¶1 VERGERONT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30751 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] WI APP 30
) Reptile; or (c) Amphibian. Nos. 2009AP1827-CR 2009AP1828-CR 6 on its face, § 951.02’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60385 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] WI App 64
plaintiff-respondent-cross- appellant, the cause was submitted on the briefs of Jeffrey Morris and John C
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=112663 - 2017-09-21

Deutsches Land, Inc. v. City of Glendale
motion for costs and attorney fees, pursuant to Wis. Stat. Rule 809.25(3). Under Rule 809.25(3)(c)2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19038 - 2005-07-18