Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27811 - 27820 of 37057 for f h.
Search results 27811 - 27820 of 37057 for f h.
COURT OF APPEALS
are “equally important purposes” of the Juvenile Justice Code. See Wis. Stat. § 938.01(2)(a), (f). The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87593 - 2012-10-02
are “equally important purposes” of the Juvenile Justice Code. See Wis. Stat. § 938.01(2)(a), (f). The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87593 - 2012-10-02
[PDF]
NOTICE
pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(f) (2005-06). All references to the Wisconsin Statutes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33706 - 2014-09-15
pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(f) (2005-06). All references to the Wisconsin Statutes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33706 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
defense likely would have succeeded at trial. See, e.g., Evans v. Meyer, 742 F.2d 371, 375 (7th Cir. 1984
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89579 - 2012-11-26
defense likely would have succeeded at trial. See, e.g., Evans v. Meyer, 742 F.2d 371, 375 (7th Cir. 1984
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89579 - 2012-11-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, given that Riley has only prospective application. See Young v. Pfeiffer, 933 F.3d 1123, 1125 & n.1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=872007 - 2024-11-05
, given that Riley has only prospective application. See Young v. Pfeiffer, 933 F.3d 1123, 1125 & n.1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=872007 - 2024-11-05
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
-in-chief for his direct appeal, where it was noted that the transcript had not been transcribed “[f
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=987038 - 2025-07-22
-in-chief for his direct appeal, where it was noted that the transcript had not been transcribed “[f
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=987038 - 2025-07-22
COURT OF APPEALS
or increased earning power of the other, under § 767.61(3)(f). In its memorandum decision, the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31791 - 2008-02-11
or increased earning power of the other, under § 767.61(3)(f). In its memorandum decision, the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31791 - 2008-02-11
State v. Daniel J. Bohringer
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Jefferson County: william f. hue, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5832 - 2005-03-31
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Jefferson County: william f. hue, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5832 - 2005-03-31
State v. Eugene G.
in the community.” And also (f) which reads “To respond to a juvenile offender’s needs for care and treatment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6692 - 2005-03-31
in the community.” And also (f) which reads “To respond to a juvenile offender’s needs for care and treatment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6692 - 2005-03-31
State v. Patricia G.
: “[F]or each and every court appearance, you have to be here. The Court could strike your contest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6515 - 2005-03-31
: “[F]or each and every court appearance, you have to be here. The Court could strike your contest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6515 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, counsel filed three supplemental no-merit reports pursuant to RULE 809.32(1)(f). Brown filed responses
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=139003 - 2017-09-21
, counsel filed three supplemental no-merit reports pursuant to RULE 809.32(1)(f). Brown filed responses
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=139003 - 2017-09-21