Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27821 - 27830 of 37953 for d's.
Search results 27821 - 27830 of 37953 for d's.
CA Blank Order
that mitigating circumstances made his crime “less reprehensible,” warranting that it be “reduce[d] to a lesser
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104324 - 2013-11-19
that mitigating circumstances made his crime “less reprehensible,” warranting that it be “reduce[d] to a lesser
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104324 - 2013-11-19
State v. Ronald C. Foust
was submitted on the brief of John D. Lubarsky, assistant state public defender. Respondent ATTORNEYS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12105 - 2005-03-31
was submitted on the brief of John D. Lubarsky, assistant state public defender. Respondent ATTORNEYS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12105 - 2005-03-31
State v. Angel E.
. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ No. 95-2968 IN THE INTEREST OF DYLAN J. D. E. a person under the age of 18: STATE OF WISCONSIN
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9886 - 2005-03-31
. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ No. 95-2968 IN THE INTEREST OF DYLAN J. D. E. a person under the age of 18: STATE OF WISCONSIN
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9886 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Brian K. John
. ¶3 The affidavit supporting the warrant stated that FBI agent D. Fitzgerald was advised that John’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15151 - 2017-09-21
. ¶3 The affidavit supporting the warrant stated that FBI agent D. Fitzgerald was advised that John’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15151 - 2017-09-21
Robert E. Bowman v. Dane County Board of Adjustment
, 1996. The amendment has no effect on this appeal. [3] For example, subpart (9)(d), which applies
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11252 - 2005-03-31
, 1996. The amendment has no effect on this appeal. [3] For example, subpart (9)(d), which applies
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11252 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Daniel Slaughter
: (1) Whoever does either of the following is guilty of a Class D Felony: .... (b) Makes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8516 - 2017-09-19
: (1) Whoever does either of the following is guilty of a Class D Felony: .... (b) Makes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8516 - 2017-09-19
State v. Pamela P.
their children, that fundamental right must give way to a higher “countervailing interest.” See, e.g., Richard D
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6767 - 2005-03-31
their children, that fundamental right must give way to a higher “countervailing interest.” See, e.g., Richard D
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6767 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Charles Jasper, Jr.
five times in his life and “denie[d] any problems with alcohol or drug abuse.” ¶9 Jasper’s friends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2440 - 2017-09-19
five times in his life and “denie[d] any problems with alcohol or drug abuse.” ¶9 Jasper’s friends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2440 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Audell Hernandez
from a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Brown County: JOHN D. MCKAY, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15395 - 2017-09-21
from a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Brown County: JOHN D. MCKAY, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15395 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Tecia D.B.
these relationships. (d) The wishes of the child. (e) The duration of the separation of the parent from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6836 - 2017-09-20
these relationships. (d) The wishes of the child. (e) The duration of the separation of the parent from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6836 - 2017-09-20