Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27821 - 27830 of 30076 for de.

[PDF] Norvin Lewis v. Physicians Insurance Company of Wisconsin
to the facts, this appeal only raises a question of law, which we review de novo. L.L.N. v. Clauder, 209
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17467 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
on the expectations of the ultimate user or consumer. See Godoy v. E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Co., 2009 WI 78, ¶41
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64000 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
of the circuit court for Waukesha County: linda m. van de water, Judge. Affirmed. Before Brown
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62866 - 2011-04-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
decision to select the City’s offer. On our de novo review of the arbitration award, we similarly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143952 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo. John Doe 56 v. Mayo Clinic Health System, 2016 WI 48, ¶14, ___ Wis. 2d ___, ___ N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171776 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Jaime R. Peterson v. Volkswagen of America, Inc.
there is a "written warranty" as defined under the Act.11 Statutory interpretation is an issue of law, reviewed de
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18355 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Evan Zimmerman
, which we review de novo. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d at 634. The defendant has the burden of persuasion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5901 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] WI App 10
is a legal question we decide de novo). There was no physical evidence to support the alleged assaults
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158239 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
(quoted source omitted). We review de novo the circuit court’s determination that Doe’s complaint fails
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=946620 - 2025-04-24

Frontsheet
de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Eisenberg, 2004 WI 14, ¶5, 269 Wis. 2d 43, 675
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84272 - 2012-06-28