Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27831 - 27840 of 59393 for quit claim deed.
Search results 27831 - 27840 of 59393 for quit claim deed.
[PDF]
State v. Derek W. Pfeil
. This claim is also unavailing. As aptly explained by the State, “Pfeil never offered testimony from his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4951 - 2017-09-19
. This claim is also unavailing. As aptly explained by the State, “Pfeil never offered testimony from his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4951 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
City of Wautoma v. David H. Jansen
in his argument.2 2 In his reply brief, Jansen claims for the first time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9249 - 2017-09-19
in his argument.2 2 In his reply brief, Jansen claims for the first time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9249 - 2017-09-19
State v. Antonio L. Ford
in reviewing this appeal. ¶5 Ford’s first claim is that his counsel should have argued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2936 - 2005-03-31
in reviewing this appeal. ¶5 Ford’s first claim is that his counsel should have argued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2936 - 2005-03-31
State v. Susan Triggs
postconviction motion, which alleged that she received ineffective assistance of trial counsel. Triggs claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16024 - 2005-03-31
postconviction motion, which alleged that she received ineffective assistance of trial counsel. Triggs claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16024 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. ¶9 The statute at issue here is more akin to a notice of claim statute, as opposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141313 - 2015-05-04
. ¶9 The statute at issue here is more akin to a notice of claim statute, as opposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141313 - 2015-05-04
State v. Sean P. Tate
(1978) (defendant may not assert vicarious Fourth Amendment claims). Again, counsel had no obligation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4296 - 2005-03-31
(1978) (defendant may not assert vicarious Fourth Amendment claims). Again, counsel had no obligation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4296 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. We reject Pope’s claim and affirm the judgment of the circuit court. ¶2 In 2006, DexM entered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91316 - 2014-09-15
. We reject Pope’s claim and affirm the judgment of the circuit court. ¶2 In 2006, DexM entered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91316 - 2014-09-15
State v. Thomas W. Reimann
the repeater portion of his sentence, claiming that the State did not prove a prior conviction with the degree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9603 - 2005-03-31
the repeater portion of his sentence, claiming that the State did not prove a prior conviction with the degree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9603 - 2005-03-31
Rachel Jensen v. J.C. Penney Life Insurance Company
816, 820 (1987). We first examine the pleadings and affidavits to determine whether a claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9878 - 2005-03-31
816, 820 (1987). We first examine the pleadings and affidavits to determine whether a claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9878 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to a notice of claim statute, as opposed to a redemption statute or statute of limitation, as argued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141313 - 2017-09-21
to a notice of claim statute, as opposed to a redemption statute or statute of limitation, as argued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141313 - 2017-09-21