Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27841 - 27850 of 64751 for b's.
Search results 27841 - 27850 of 64751 for b's.
COURT OF APPEALS
809.23(1)(b)4. [1] This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 752.31(2)(f) (2007
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46760 - 2005-02-08
809.23(1)(b)4. [1] This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 752.31(2)(f) (2007
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46760 - 2005-02-08
[PDF]
City of Owen v. Rodney Satonica
to do the same. (b) Engages in a course of conduct or repeatedly commits acts which harass
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11624 - 2017-09-19
to do the same. (b) Engages in a course of conduct or repeatedly commits acts which harass
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11624 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
) (a) or (am) or when required to do so under sub. (3) (ar) or (b). Any such tests shall be administered upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35733 - 2014-09-15
) (a) or (am) or when required to do so under sub. (3) (ar) or (b). Any such tests shall be administered upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35733 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
this argument. B. Explanation of Deviation and Consideration of the Statutory Factors ¶14 Jansson contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98320 - 2013-06-19
this argument. B. Explanation of Deviation and Consideration of the Statutory Factors ¶14 Jansson contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98320 - 2013-06-19
State v. Michael L. Marks
Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)5. [1] All subsequent references to the Wisconsin Statutes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6610 - 2005-03-31
Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)5. [1] All subsequent references to the Wisconsin Statutes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6610 - 2005-03-31
Lincoln County v. Misty K.
by five-sixths of the jury. See Wis. Stat. § 51.20(11)(b). The jury’s verdict in this case was unanimous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2098 - 2013-10-22
by five-sixths of the jury. See Wis. Stat. § 51.20(11)(b). The jury’s verdict in this case was unanimous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2098 - 2013-10-22
COURT OF APPEALS
that “[b]ased on the specificity of the informant’s information and the informant’s willingness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109118 - 2007-10-30
that “[b]ased on the specificity of the informant’s information and the informant’s willingness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109118 - 2007-10-30
COURT OF APPEALS
to use the evidence for was valid, we conclude the first Sullivan prong is satisfied. B. Relevance ¶15
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78236 - 2012-02-21
to use the evidence for was valid, we conclude the first Sullivan prong is satisfied. B. Relevance ¶15
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78236 - 2012-02-21
COURT OF APPEALS
weapon, contrary to Wis. Stat. §§ 941.30(1) and 939.63(1)(b) (2009-10).[1] He also appeals from an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93052 - 2005-03-31
weapon, contrary to Wis. Stat. §§ 941.30(1) and 939.63(1)(b) (2009-10).[1] He also appeals from an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93052 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
-related driving conviction], contrary to [WIS. STAT. §] 343.44(1)(b), 343.44(2)(ar)2…, a Misdemeanor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=152997 - 2017-09-21
-related driving conviction], contrary to [WIS. STAT. §] 343.44(1)(b), 343.44(2)(ar)2…, a Misdemeanor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=152997 - 2017-09-21