Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27841 - 27850 of 30059 for de.
Search results 27841 - 27850 of 30059 for de.
Mary Jo Howard Croake v. Paul Allen Croake
is substantial is a question of law which we review de novo. Dahlke v. Dahlke, 2002 WI App 282, ¶8, 258 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17775 - 2005-04-18
is substantial is a question of law which we review de novo. Dahlke v. Dahlke, 2002 WI App 282, ¶8, 258 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17775 - 2005-04-18
2009 WI APP 140
and affirm. ¶14 “The interpretation of a statute is a question of law which we review de novo.” Grosse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39214 - 2009-09-28
and affirm. ¶14 “The interpretation of a statute is a question of law which we review de novo.” Grosse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39214 - 2009-09-28
Roger and Donna Anhalt v. Cities and Villages Mutual Insurance Company
of Review ¶8 The review of a grant or denial of summary judgment is de novo, using
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3451 - 2005-03-31
of Review ¶8 The review of a grant or denial of summary judgment is de novo, using
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3451 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Daniel Anderson
violated is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. See State v. Sauceda, 168 Wis. 2d 486
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17082 - 2017-09-21
violated is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. See State v. Sauceda, 168 Wis. 2d 486
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17082 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
City of Racine v. Waste Facility Siting Board
is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. See Lake City Corp. v. City of Mequon, 207 Wis. 2d
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17099 - 2017-09-21
is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. See Lake City Corp. v. City of Mequon, 207 Wis. 2d
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17099 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
N.W.2d 687 (1996). In Wisconsin, we review those determinations de novo. See id. at 18
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39505 - 2014-09-15
N.W.2d 687 (1996). In Wisconsin, we review those determinations de novo. See id. at 18
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39505 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
decision to select the City’s offer. On our de novo review of the arbitration award, we similarly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143952 - 2017-09-21
decision to select the City’s offer. On our de novo review of the arbitration award, we similarly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143952 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Tony M. Smith
is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Wills, 193 Wis. 2d 273, 277, 533 N.W.2d 165 (1995
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16974 - 2017-09-21
is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Wills, 193 Wis. 2d 273, 277, 533 N.W.2d 165 (1995
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16974 - 2017-09-21
Wisconsin Central Limited v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
construction of § 76.09, Stats., a question of law, which we review de novo. See State v. Setagord, 211 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15032 - 2005-03-31
construction of § 76.09, Stats., a question of law, which we review de novo. See State v. Setagord, 211 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15032 - 2005-03-31
Frontsheet
the circuit court's findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous. Id. We then review de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95267 - 2013-04-08
the circuit court's findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous. Id. We then review de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95267 - 2013-04-08