Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27841 - 27850 of 36288 for e's.

COURT OF APPEALS
and State v. Bangert, 131 Wis. 2d 246, 261-62, 389 N.W.2d 12 (1986), including “[e]stablish[ing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55523 - 2010-10-18

Rule Order
that occurred in the 2009-10 term, a case, Ehlinger, was held for 8.5 months after it was circulated. E-L
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82165 - 2012-05-03

Gary Tate v. David H. Schwarz
, assistant attorney general, and James E. Doyle, attorney general. COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2709 - 2005-03-31

Donald Savinski v. Karren Kimble
on the brief of James E. Doyle, attorney general, and Maryann Sumi, asst. attorney general. COURT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13278 - 2005-03-31

La Crosse Queen, Inc. v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
was submitted on the brief of James E. Doyle, attorney general, and Gerald S. Wilcox, assistant attorney general
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9777 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
Wis. Stat. Rule 809.19(1)(e) proper appellate argument requires an argument containing the contention
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29038 - 2007-05-14

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
]e personally helped save about 1500 lives when his team was one of the first rescue units
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210301 - 2018-03-28

wi app 70 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2012AP1928 Complete Title of...
so, “[w]e assume that the legislature’s intent is expressed in the statutory language.” Id., 2004 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95527 - 2013-05-28

[PDF] Mary C. Pentinmaki v. Oliver A. Pentinmaki, Jr.
of discretionary rulings is well settled. Generally, "[w]e will not reverse a discretionary determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9059 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
.2d 256 (explaining that citations only to the appendix are inadequate and that “[w]e have no duty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=917441 - 2025-02-20