Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27851 - 27860 of 62778 for child support.
Search results 27851 - 27860 of 62778 for child support.
COURT OF APPEALS
validates the arrest, and also had reasonable suspicion to support a subsequent blood draw; and (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61362 - 2011-03-16
validates the arrest, and also had reasonable suspicion to support a subsequent blood draw; and (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61362 - 2011-03-16
[PDF]
NOTICE
— indicated she had been sexually assaulted. This theory was further supported, he contended, by evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36671 - 2014-09-15
— indicated she had been sexually assaulted. This theory was further supported, he contended, by evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36671 - 2014-09-15
State v. Jeffery L. Watson
appropriate and consistent with all of the sentencing goals that I have mentioned. The State, in support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13804 - 2005-03-31
appropriate and consistent with all of the sentencing goals that I have mentioned. The State, in support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13804 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
to properly assess the dynamics of Rogers[’s] argument in lieu of evidence that supported that both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99398 - 2013-07-15
to properly assess the dynamics of Rogers[’s] argument in lieu of evidence that supported that both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99398 - 2013-07-15
Village of Walworth v. Ryan S. Wood
reasonable.”[3] It appears that the State took this action without prior notice to Wood. In support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16011 - 2005-03-31
reasonable.”[3] It appears that the State took this action without prior notice to Wood. In support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16011 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. David Dellis
and voluntarily entered; (2) whether a factual basis supported the pleas; (3) whether trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15567 - 2017-09-21
and voluntarily entered; (2) whether a factual basis supported the pleas; (3) whether trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15567 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
is insufficient to support its claim. Because that issue is dispositive, we do not address the first issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30343 - 2014-09-15
is insufficient to support its claim. Because that issue is dispositive, we do not address the first issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30343 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. ADMIN. CODE § INS 2.16(6) is not supported by the evidence; and (3) he contends that the OCI failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=78530 - 2014-09-15
. ADMIN. CODE § INS 2.16(6) is not supported by the evidence; and (3) he contends that the OCI failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=78530 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
on the plea transcript as factual support. Id., ¶¶5-6, 26. However, the defendant in Ernst failed to point
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116050 - 2017-09-21
on the plea transcript as factual support. Id., ¶¶5-6, 26. However, the defendant in Ernst failed to point
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116050 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
position that there was no such agreement is supported by non- testimonial evidence that includes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94619 - 2014-09-15
position that there was no such agreement is supported by non- testimonial evidence that includes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94619 - 2014-09-15