Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27851 - 27860 of 29966 for de.
Search results 27851 - 27860 of 29966 for de.
State v. Kevin L. C.
constitutional right of confrontation, however, is a question of law which we review de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12352 - 2005-03-31
constitutional right of confrontation, however, is a question of law which we review de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12352 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Gregory L.S.
and 48.31. ¶30 Statutory interpretation is a question of law that we decide de novo. Minuteman, Inc
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4342 - 2017-09-19
and 48.31. ¶30 Statutory interpretation is a question of law that we decide de novo. Minuteman, Inc
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4342 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
17 jeopardy has been infringed is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68894 - 2014-09-15
17 jeopardy has been infringed is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68894 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Jaime R. Peterson v. Volkswagen of America, Inc.
there is a "written warranty" as defined under the Act.11 Statutory interpretation is an issue of law, reviewed de
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18355 - 2017-09-21
there is a "written warranty" as defined under the Act.11 Statutory interpretation is an issue of law, reviewed de
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18355 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, ¶6, 237 Wis. 2d 709, 616 N.W.2d 126. Our review is de novo. See State v. Borhegyi, 222 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81728 - 2014-09-15
, ¶6, 237 Wis. 2d 709, 616 N.W.2d 126. Our review is de novo. See State v. Borhegyi, 222 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81728 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
omitted). The interpretation of the statute presents a question of law, which we review de novo. Town
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195380 - 2017-09-21
omitted). The interpretation of the statute presents a question of law, which we review de novo. Town
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195380 - 2017-09-21
Jesus Ortega, Jr. v. Gary R. McCaughtry
in the preceding paragraph. Since we apply the substantial evidence test de novo in this appeal, Ortega has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13125 - 2005-03-31
in the preceding paragraph. Since we apply the substantial evidence test de novo in this appeal, Ortega has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13125 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
constitutes ineffective assistance is a question of law, which we review de novo.” Id. A. Golden rule
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1043058 - 2025-11-25
constitutes ineffective assistance is a question of law, which we review de novo.” Id. A. Golden rule
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1043058 - 2025-11-25
COURT OF APPEALS
. This is a question of law that we review de novo. [State v.] Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d [303,] 309-10[, 548 N.W.2d 50
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31640 - 2008-01-28
. This is a question of law that we review de novo. [State v.] Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d [303,] 309-10[, 548 N.W.2d 50
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31640 - 2008-01-28
[PDF]
Joseph W. v. Catholic Diocese of Madison
DISCUSSION We review summary judgments de novo, employing the same methodology as the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11207 - 2017-09-19
DISCUSSION We review summary judgments de novo, employing the same methodology as the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11207 - 2017-09-19