Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27851 - 27860 of 42972 for t o.
Search results 27851 - 27860 of 42972 for t o.
State v. Gregory J. Franklin
about the defendant's prior misconduct: [T]he first thing I was looking for in Mr. Franklin's situation
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16416 - 2005-03-31
about the defendant's prior misconduct: [T]he first thing I was looking for in Mr. Franklin's situation
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16416 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jerry J. Meeks
-petitioner there was a brief by Christopher T. Van Wagner and Van Wagner & Woods, S.C., Madison, and oral
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16471 - 2005-03-31
-petitioner there was a brief by Christopher T. Van Wagner and Van Wagner & Woods, S.C., Madison, and oral
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16471 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. James R. Thiel
JUDGE: Dale T. Pasell JUSTICES: CONCURRED: DISSENTED: NOT PARTICIPATING
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16516 - 2017-09-21
JUDGE: Dale T. Pasell JUSTICES: CONCURRED: DISSENTED: NOT PARTICIPATING
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16516 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this summary disposition order will not be published. Sheila T. Reiff Clerk of Court of Appeals
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=246408 - 2019-09-11
that this summary disposition order will not be published. Sheila T. Reiff Clerk of Court of Appeals
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=246408 - 2019-09-11
State v. Jesus Serrano
, as a second or subsequent offense, see §§ 161.14(4)(t), 161.41(1m)(h)(2), and 161.48, Stats., and possession
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9718 - 2005-03-31
, as a second or subsequent offense, see §§ 161.14(4)(t), 161.41(1m)(h)(2), and 161.48, Stats., and possession
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9718 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Scott F. Strerath
.” At trial, Strerath’s defense counsel acknowledged, “[t]he court made a finding that [Strerath] did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2645 - 2017-09-19
.” At trial, Strerath’s defense counsel acknowledged, “[t]he court made a finding that [Strerath] did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2645 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Kelly A. Bible
in State v. Modory, 204 Wis.2d 538, 544, 555 N.W.2d 399, 401 (Ct. App. 1996): [T]he purpose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13930 - 2014-09-15
in State v. Modory, 204 Wis.2d 538, 544, 555 N.W.2d 399, 401 (Ct. App. 1996): [T]he purpose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13930 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
. Additionally, “[t]he prisoner has the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that the actions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39221 - 2014-09-15
. Additionally, “[t]he prisoner has the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that the actions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39221 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for a decision in this case. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.82(2)(a) (“[T]he court upon its own motion … may enlarge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=851534 - 2024-09-17
for a decision in this case. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.82(2)(a) (“[T]he court upon its own motion … may enlarge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=851534 - 2024-09-17
[PDF]
NOTICE
or disorder,” and next to that typed inquiry, he added in his own handwriting “[t]reatment for Bipolar
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50285 - 2014-09-15
or disorder,” and next to that typed inquiry, he added in his own handwriting “[t]reatment for Bipolar
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50285 - 2014-09-15