Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27861 - 27870 of 29713 for des.

Aldene Kannenberg v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
. Kannenberg argues that we should give no weight to LIRC’s interpretation of the statute, employing a de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12003 - 2005-03-31

Leonard Goetzka v. City of Black River Falls
the same methodology as the circuit court and our review is de novo. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20000 - 2005-11-14

[PDF] State v. Leo E. Wanta
challenges to the sufficiency of the evidence necessary to support a verdict de novo, applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13586 - 2017-09-21

Go America L.L.C. v. Kwik Trip, Inc.
judgment, we employ the same methodology as the circuit court, and our review is de novo. Green Spring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24867 - 2006-05-30

[PDF] WI APP 63
, this presents a question of law that we review de novo. See Walter v. Cessna Aircraft Co., 121 Wis. 2d 221
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47759 - 2014-09-15

2007 WI App 259
at issue. ¶42 Again, our standard of review is de novo as this involves the interpretation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30842 - 2007-12-18

2010 WI APP 63
review de novo. See Walter v. Cessna Aircraft Co., 121 Wis. 2d 221, 231, 358 N.W.2d 816 (Ct. App. 1984
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47759 - 2010-05-25

[PDF] WI App 10
is a legal question we decide de novo). There was no physical evidence to support the alleged assaults
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158239 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Tony M. Smith
is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Wills, 193 Wis. 2d 273, 277, 533 N.W.2d 165 (1995
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16974 - 2017-09-21

Frontsheet
they are found to be clearly erroneous, but we review the referee's conclusions of law on a de novo basis. In re
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115395 - 2014-06-23