Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27861 - 27870 of 63277 for records.
Search results 27861 - 27870 of 63277 for records.
[PDF]
Susan L. Maginn v. Richard D. Maginn
of record and the correct legal standards and the award is neither excessive nor inadequate. Haugen v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10640 - 2017-09-20
of record and the correct legal standards and the award is neither excessive nor inadequate. Haugen v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10640 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and an independent review of the record, we conclude that the judgment may be summarily affirmed because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=451370 - 2021-11-10
and an independent review of the record, we conclude that the judgment may be summarily affirmed because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=451370 - 2021-11-10
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
2 RULE 809.21. After my independent review of the records, I conclude there is no arguable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=148193 - 2017-09-21
2 RULE 809.21. After my independent review of the records, I conclude there is no arguable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=148193 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
property. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106237 - 2017-09-21
property. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106237 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
independently reviewing the entire records, as well as the no-merit report, we conclude that counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=986619 - 2025-07-22
independently reviewing the entire records, as well as the no-merit report, we conclude that counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=986619 - 2025-07-22
State v. Jason Luepke
170 (1981), to support his argument that the trial court must state reasons on the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2470 - 2005-03-31
170 (1981), to support his argument that the trial court must state reasons on the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2470 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
reviewed the entire record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=660055 - 2023-05-23
reviewed the entire record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=660055 - 2023-05-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
elected not to do so. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=288382 - 2020-09-22
elected not to do so. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=288382 - 2020-09-22
CA Blank Order
record, as well as the no-merit report, we agree with counsel’s assessment that there are no arguably
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110338 - 2014-04-10
record, as well as the no-merit report, we agree with counsel’s assessment that there are no arguably
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110338 - 2014-04-10
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
letter, and the record, we conclude that a challenge to the DNA surcharge would be arguably meritorious
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104202 - 2017-09-21
letter, and the record, we conclude that a challenge to the DNA surcharge would be arguably meritorious
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104202 - 2017-09-21