Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27871 - 27880 of 58506 for speedy trial.

State v. Andre Bolden
robbery with the use of force, see Wis. Stat. §§ 943.32(1)(a) and 939.32, and from the trial court’s order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5858 - 2005-03-31

State v. Eric W. Raye
for postconviction relief. Raye contends the trial court erred by individually questioning a juror and then sending
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7394 - 2005-03-31

Barbara J. Walbrink v. American Family Insurance Group
an underground oil tank to rupture and contaminate the property during the policy period. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7795 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
. Merry contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress on grounds
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56705 - 2010-11-16

COURT OF APPEALS
for the heater and installation. The trial court ordered judgment in favor of Steiner. We affirm. FACTS ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56955 - 2010-11-23

[PDF] Sharon K. Sonnentag v. John Schindler
reverse the judgment and remand with directions to grant a new trial on the apportionment of negligence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10527 - 2017-09-20

State v. Kelly J. Kloss
pursuant to the Implied Consent Law, § 343.305(10), Stats. The order followed a hearing at which the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15248 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
and Christopher J. Bauer. After a trial to the court, the circuit court initially ruled in Frazier’s favor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149355 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
as a party to a crime. His first trial resulted in a mistrial after it came to light that material
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=851154 - 2024-09-17

State v. Donnis J.
adjudging him delinquent after the trial court found him guilty of disorderly conduct contrary to § 947.01
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13781 - 2005-03-31