Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27881 - 27890 of 29962 for de.
Search results 27881 - 27890 of 29962 for de.
Leonard Goetzka v. City of Black River Falls
the same methodology as the circuit court and our review is de novo. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20000 - 2005-11-14
the same methodology as the circuit court and our review is de novo. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20000 - 2005-11-14
Joan La Rock v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
in the area of Indian taxation, de novo review is appropriate because there is no evidence that the agency
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17500 - 2005-03-31
in the area of Indian taxation, de novo review is appropriate because there is no evidence that the agency
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17500 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
reviews de novo. Oneida County DSS v. Therese S., 2008 WI App 159, ¶7, 314 Wis. 2d 493, 762 N.W.2d 122
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48077 - 2010-03-17
reviews de novo. Oneida County DSS v. Therese S., 2008 WI App 159, ¶7, 314 Wis. 2d 493, 762 N.W.2d 122
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48077 - 2010-03-17
COURT OF APPEALS
. This is a question of law that we review de novo. [State v.] Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d [303,] 309-10[, 548 N.W.2d 50
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31640 - 2008-01-28
. This is a question of law that we review de novo. [State v.] Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d [303,] 309-10[, 548 N.W.2d 50
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31640 - 2008-01-28
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 23, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Cour...
complaint. ¶17 We review a grant or denial of summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74301 - 2011-11-22
complaint. ¶17 We review a grant or denial of summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74301 - 2011-11-22
State v. Shon D. Brown
interpretation subject to our de novo review. See State v. Gribble, 2001 WI App 227, ¶¶26-27 n.10, ¶31, 248 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5151 - 2005-03-31
interpretation subject to our de novo review. See State v. Gribble, 2001 WI App 227, ¶¶26-27 n.10, ¶31, 248 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5151 - 2005-03-31
Brew City Redevelopment Group, LLC v. The Ferchill Group
, our review is de novo and is limited to whether Brew City’s complaint asserts claims for which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21368 - 2006-03-22
, our review is de novo and is limited to whether Brew City’s complaint asserts claims for which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21368 - 2006-03-22
[PDF]
WI 19
are reviewed de novo. In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Tully, 2005 WI 100, ¶25, 283 Wis. 2d 124, 699
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48354 - 2014-09-15
are reviewed de novo. In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Tully, 2005 WI 100, ¶25, 283 Wis. 2d 124, 699
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48354 - 2014-09-15
Raymond Allen v. Elizabeth Snider Allen
, which we review de novo. Id. ¶36 A claim is not frivolous merely because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15386 - 2005-03-31
, which we review de novo. Id. ¶36 A claim is not frivolous merely because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15386 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
or consumer. See Godoy v. E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Co., 2009 WI 78, ¶41, 319 Wis. 2d 91, 768 N.W.2d 674
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64000 - 2011-05-11
or consumer. See Godoy v. E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Co., 2009 WI 78, ¶41, 319 Wis. 2d 91, 768 N.W.2d 674
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64000 - 2011-05-11