Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27891 - 27900 of 63223 for records.
Search results 27891 - 27900 of 63223 for records.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
independently reviewing the entire records, as well as the no-merit report, we conclude that counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=986619 - 2025-07-22
independently reviewing the entire records, as well as the no-merit report, we conclude that counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=986619 - 2025-07-22
[PDF]
State v. Ue Thao
of 346.14 and will find Mr. Thao guilty of that particular Statute …. However, our review of the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7636 - 2017-09-19
of 346.14 and will find Mr. Thao guilty of that particular Statute …. However, our review of the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7636 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141759 - 2017-09-21
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141759 - 2017-09-21
Frontsheet
denying his postconviction motion for resentencing. After reviewing the record and the briefs of both
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32656 - 2008-05-08
denying his postconviction motion for resentencing. After reviewing the record and the briefs of both
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32656 - 2008-05-08
[PDF]
Robert Abraham v. Patrick Fox
responded they did not. Our review of the record discloses there are no alleged evidentiary facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2302 - 2017-09-19
responded they did not. Our review of the record discloses there are no alleged evidentiary facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2302 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and an independent review of the record, we conclude that the judgment may be summarily affirmed because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=451370 - 2021-11-10
and an independent review of the record, we conclude that the judgment may be summarily affirmed because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=451370 - 2021-11-10
CA Blank Order
. Anna has responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95998 - 2013-04-29
. Anna has responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95998 - 2013-04-29
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
matters. The record shows no other ground to withdraw the plea. There is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=156848 - 2017-09-21
matters. The record shows no other ground to withdraw the plea. There is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=156848 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
’ claims are procedurally barred. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=650563 - 2023-05-02
’ claims are procedurally barred. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=650563 - 2023-05-02
State v. Cornell Clark
the officers’ and could have been anticipated based on the officers’ reports. The record provides no basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16218 - 2005-03-31
the officers’ and could have been anticipated based on the officers’ reports. The record provides no basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16218 - 2005-03-31