Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27891 - 27900 of 83395 for simple case search.
Search results 27891 - 27900 of 83395 for simple case search.
State v. Kenneth Dwight Spaulding
) that the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion. The cases, all tried together, were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16322 - 2005-03-31
) that the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion. The cases, all tried together, were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16322 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
to the bankruptcy filings. However, the dismissal order stated, “This case may be reopened upon notice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93547 - 2015-02-03
to the bankruptcy filings. However, the dismissal order stated, “This case may be reopened upon notice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93547 - 2015-02-03
Karen R. Yocherer v. Farmers Insurance Exchange
2002 WI 41 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 00-0944 Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16373 - 2005-03-31
2002 WI 41 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 00-0944 Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16373 - 2005-03-31
WI App 97 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case Nos.: 2012AP1769-CR 2012AP1770-CR 2...
2013 WI App 97 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case Nos.: 2012AP1769-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99340 - 2014-03-09
2013 WI App 97 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case Nos.: 2012AP1769-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99340 - 2014-03-09
State v. Kenneth Dwight Spaulding
) that the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion. The cases, all tried together, were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16321 - 2005-03-31
) that the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion. The cases, all tried together, were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16321 - 2005-03-31
Randall Schwartz v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
2002 WI App 255 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 02-0372 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4926 - 2005-03-31
2002 WI App 255 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 02-0372 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4926 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. George S. Tulley
2001 WI App 236 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 00-3084-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3263 - 2017-09-19
2001 WI App 236 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 00-3084-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3263 - 2017-09-19
State v. Stephen R. Hart
was "the strength of this case."[1] After Reichert testified, the jury was excused
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8129 - 2005-03-31
was "the strength of this case."[1] After Reichert testified, the jury was excused
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8129 - 2005-03-31
State v. John F. Goralski
of expert testimony in such cases constitutes an insufficiency of proof. State v. Doerr, 229 Wis. 2d 616
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3187 - 2005-03-31
of expert testimony in such cases constitutes an insufficiency of proof. State v. Doerr, 229 Wis. 2d 616
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3187 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
guilty plea and other conditions. A.A. was never called as a witness. ¶4 The case hinged almost
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=199648 - 2017-11-24
guilty plea and other conditions. A.A. was never called as a witness. ¶4 The case hinged almost
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=199648 - 2017-11-24