Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27901 - 27910 of 66434 for motion to dismiss.
Search results 27901 - 27910 of 66434 for motion to dismiss.
Iowa County Department of Human Services v. Mary M.K.
that the abandonment “count” had been dismissed; and (4) an alleged erroneous exercise of discretion in denying her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2164 - 2005-03-31
that the abandonment “count” had been dismissed; and (4) an alleged erroneous exercise of discretion in denying her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2164 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Frederick W. Prager
. STAT. § 948.025(1) (2003-04).1 Two additional counts were dismissed, with the provision they would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17633 - 2017-09-21
. STAT. § 948.025(1) (2003-04).1 Two additional counts were dismissed, with the provision they would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17633 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
dismissed. ¶4 At Thomas’s initial appearance, the circuit court ordered a competency evaluation under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=963881 - 2025-06-03
dismissed. ¶4 At Thomas’s initial appearance, the circuit court ordered a competency evaluation under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=963881 - 2025-06-03
Badger III Limited Partnership v. Howard
to the defendants, dismissing Badger III's complaint. Badger III appeals from that judgment and from the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8289 - 2005-03-31
to the defendants, dismissing Badger III's complaint. Badger III appeals from that judgment and from the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8289 - 2005-03-31
State v. John S. Provo
. § 948.07(3) (2001-02)[1] and a postconviction order denying his motion for plea withdrawal and a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6624 - 2005-03-31
. § 948.07(3) (2001-02)[1] and a postconviction order denying his motion for plea withdrawal and a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6624 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of damages. Hubbartt filed a pretrial motion seeking to preclude Bischel’s expert testimony. As grounds
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=576964 - 2022-10-12
of damages. Hubbartt filed a pretrial motion seeking to preclude Bischel’s expert testimony. As grounds
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=576964 - 2022-10-12
Robert Schmitz v. Fire Insurance Exchange
Schmitz and FIE filed cross-motions for summary judgment. Following oral argument, the trial court found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7547 - 2005-05-09
Schmitz and FIE filed cross-motions for summary judgment. Following oral argument, the trial court found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7547 - 2005-05-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
court denying his motion for a new trial. Maher requests that we exercise our discretionary authority
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64852 - 2014-09-15
court denying his motion for a new trial. Maher requests that we exercise our discretionary authority
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64852 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a motor vehicle while intoxicated (OWI) and No. 2016AP1910-CR 2 an order denying her motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194466 - 2017-09-21
a motor vehicle while intoxicated (OWI) and No. 2016AP1910-CR 2 an order denying her motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194466 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. John S. Provo
are to the 2001-02 version unless otherwise noted. No. 03-1710 2 order denying his motion for plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6624 - 2017-09-19
are to the 2001-02 version unless otherwise noted. No. 03-1710 2 order denying his motion for plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6624 - 2017-09-19