Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27901 - 27910 of 58337 for speedy trial.
Search results 27901 - 27910 of 58337 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a jury trial, of one count of armed robbery and one count of being a felon in possession of a firearm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=675084 - 2023-07-05
a jury trial, of one count of armed robbery and one count of being a felon in possession of a firearm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=675084 - 2023-07-05
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
. The trial court imposed the maximum sentence available: five years’ initial confinement and five years
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98930 - 2014-09-15
. The trial court imposed the maximum sentence available: five years’ initial confinement and five years
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98930 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
for a new trial.[1] Gallentine contends he received ineffective assistance of counsel when his trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46611 - 2010-02-01
for a new trial.[1] Gallentine contends he received ineffective assistance of counsel when his trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46611 - 2010-02-01
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a green card or lawful resident permit. He testified that his trial lawyer never told him that his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=461543 - 2021-12-15
a green card or lawful resident permit. He testified that his trial lawyer never told him that his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=461543 - 2021-12-15
State v. Michael C. Curran
of the United States Constitution; (2) the trial court based its probable cause finding on an erroneous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11045 - 2005-03-31
of the United States Constitution; (2) the trial court based its probable cause finding on an erroneous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11045 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. David A. Lehman
postconviction motion. Lehman contends that the trial court exceeded its statutory sentencing authority when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6474 - 2017-09-19
postconviction motion. Lehman contends that the trial court exceeded its statutory sentencing authority when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6474 - 2017-09-19
State v. Frank J. Geniesse
the fruits of his arrest should be suppressed. We conclude that the trial court correctly decided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9759 - 2005-03-31
the fruits of his arrest should be suppressed. We conclude that the trial court correctly decided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9759 - 2005-03-31
City of Superior v. Hunter Hill
under the ordinance and therefore affirm the trial court’s judgments. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5185 - 2005-03-31
under the ordinance and therefore affirm the trial court’s judgments. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5185 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
hearing, at which Schleif and Reeves testified, the trial court denied Reeves’s suppression motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35634 - 2009-02-23
hearing, at which Schleif and Reeves testified, the trial court denied Reeves’s suppression motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35634 - 2009-02-23
[PDF]
State v. Duane R. Bull
provided by his trial counsel was inadequate and that the sentence he received was unduly harsh. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11558 - 2017-09-19
provided by his trial counsel was inadequate and that the sentence he received was unduly harsh. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11558 - 2017-09-19