Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27901 - 27910 of 43157 for t o.
Search results 27901 - 27910 of 43157 for t o.
State v. Larry Anderson
for Portage County: thomas t. flugaur, Judge. Affirmed. Before Vergeront, P.J., Roggensack
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3843 - 2005-03-31
for Portage County: thomas t. flugaur, Judge. Affirmed. Before Vergeront, P.J., Roggensack
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3843 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
ORDERED that this summary disposition order will not be published. Sheila T. Reiff Clerk of Court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=615422 - 2023-02-01
ORDERED that this summary disposition order will not be published. Sheila T. Reiff Clerk of Court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=615422 - 2023-02-01
[PDF]
State v. Darren E. Brookins
” and therefore, “[t]he intoxication defense should have been considered.” Brookins also stated that counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20585 - 2017-09-21
” and therefore, “[t]he intoxication defense should have been considered.” Brookins also stated that counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20585 - 2017-09-21
Certification
In re the Paternity of F. T. R.: David J. Rosecky, Petitioner-Appellant, v
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85966 - 2012-08-08
In re the Paternity of F. T. R.: David J. Rosecky, Petitioner-Appellant, v
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85966 - 2012-08-08
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
will not be published. Sheila T. Reiff Clerk of Court of Appeals
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=366846 - 2021-05-13
will not be published. Sheila T. Reiff Clerk of Court of Appeals
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=366846 - 2021-05-13
State v. Javier Bautista-Sanchez
understand,” we agree with the circuit court’s assessment of the potential evidentiary value of the notes: [T
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20103 - 2005-10-31
understand,” we agree with the circuit court’s assessment of the potential evidentiary value of the notes: [T
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20103 - 2005-10-31
State v. Curtis L. Golston
, 1996), “[T]he plain language of § 974.06, Stats., precludes a defendant from bringing a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10624 - 2005-03-31
, 1996), “[T]he plain language of § 974.06, Stats., precludes a defendant from bringing a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10624 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED April 27, 2022 Sheila T. Reiff Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=513264 - 2022-04-27
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED April 27, 2022 Sheila T. Reiff Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=513264 - 2022-04-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED April 5, 2022 Sheila T. Reiff Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=504338 - 2022-04-05
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED April 5, 2022 Sheila T. Reiff Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=504338 - 2022-04-05
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED April 26, 2018 Sheila T. Reiff Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211856 - 2018-04-26
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED April 26, 2018 Sheila T. Reiff Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211856 - 2018-04-26