Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27911 - 27920 of 91099 for civil+disposition+summary+county.
Search results 27911 - 27920 of 91099 for civil+disposition+summary+county.
Janesville & Southeastern Railway Company v. Gardner Realty Corporation
-Appellants. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Rock County: James E. Welker
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6133 - 2005-03-31
-Appellants. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Rock County: James E. Welker
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6133 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Wandell Lee
Lee has filed a motion for summary disposition. Because this opinion resolves the merits
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26213 - 2017-09-21
Lee has filed a motion for summary disposition. Because this opinion resolves the merits
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26213 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=147260 - 2017-09-21
, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=147260 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21 (2011-12).[1] We summarily affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=119600 - 2014-08-14
is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21 (2011-12).[1] We summarily affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=119600 - 2014-08-14
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2013-14). 1 The order
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149075 - 2017-09-21
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2013-14). 1 The order
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149075 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=166542 - 2017-09-21
, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=166542 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Racine County: JON E. FREDRICKSON, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=590174 - 2022-11-16
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Racine County: JON E. FREDRICKSON, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=590174 - 2022-11-16
McCullough Plumbing, Inc. v. Village of McFarland
-Appellants. APPEAL and CROSS-APPEAL from orders of the circuit court for Dane County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20387 - 2005-11-22
-Appellants. APPEAL and CROSS-APPEAL from orders of the circuit court for Dane County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20387 - 2005-11-22
[PDF]
McCullough Plumbing, Inc. v. Village of McFarland
-APPEAL from orders of the circuit court for Dane County: DAVID T. FLANAGAN, III, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20387 - 2017-09-21
-APPEAL from orders of the circuit court for Dane County: DAVID T. FLANAGAN, III, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20387 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the circuit court for Door County: D. T. EHLERS, Judge. Affirmed. Before Stark, P.J., Hruz and Seidl
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=359713 - 2021-04-27
of the circuit court for Door County: D. T. EHLERS, Judge. Affirmed. Before Stark, P.J., Hruz and Seidl
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=359713 - 2021-04-27