Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27921 - 27930 of 29832 for des.
Search results 27921 - 27930 of 29832 for des.
State v. James M. Evers
, 448 N.W.2d at 301; Franklin, 111 Wis.2d at 687-88, 331 N.W.2d at 637. This court's de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13979 - 2005-03-31
, 448 N.W.2d at 301; Franklin, 111 Wis.2d at 687-88, 331 N.W.2d at 637. This court's de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13979 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
with the Partnership. ¶20 Our review of a circuit court’s summary judgment decision is de novo, applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=541195 - 2022-07-06
with the Partnership. ¶20 Our review of a circuit court’s summary judgment decision is de novo, applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=541195 - 2022-07-06
[PDF]
State v. Paul Rutzinski
a question of law, which we review de novo. State v. Jackson, 147 Wis. 2d 824, 829, 434 N.W.2d 386 (1989
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17464 - 2017-09-21
a question of law, which we review de novo. State v. Jackson, 147 Wis. 2d 824, 829, 434 N.W.2d 386 (1989
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17464 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Appleton Papers, Inc. v. The Home Indemnity Company
of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Reversed. Before Cane, C.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15644 - 2017-09-21
of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Reversed. Before Cane, C.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15644 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
barred is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Fortier, 2006 WI App 11, ¶18, 289 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98380 - 2014-09-15
barred is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Fortier, 2006 WI App 11, ¶18, 289 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98380 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
)(br). Whether a statute is constitutional presents a question of law subject to de novo review. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116170 - 2014-07-02
)(br). Whether a statute is constitutional presents a question of law subject to de novo review. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116170 - 2014-07-02
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was ineffective, however, is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. No. 2021AP432-CR 9 ¶19
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=611949 - 2023-01-18
was ineffective, however, is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. No. 2021AP432-CR 9 ¶19
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=611949 - 2023-01-18
State v. Agustin Velez
to require an evidentiary hearing is a question of law which we review de novo. Id. However
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17145 - 2005-03-31
to require an evidentiary hearing is a question of law which we review de novo. Id. However
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17145 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Frontsheet
questions of law reviewed de novo. Water Well Sols. Serv. Grp., 369 Wis. 2d 607, ¶12; Air Eng'g, Inc. v
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=236314 - 2019-02-28
questions of law reviewed de novo. Water Well Sols. Serv. Grp., 369 Wis. 2d 607, ¶12; Air Eng'g, Inc. v
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=236314 - 2019-02-28
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a postconviction court’s decision to deny a postconviction motion without an evidentiary hearing under the de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191575 - 2017-09-21
a postconviction court’s decision to deny a postconviction motion without an evidentiary hearing under the de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191575 - 2017-09-21