Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27931 - 27940 of 29714 for des.
Search results 27931 - 27940 of 29714 for des.
[PDF]
NOTICE
a lawyer’s performance was deficient and, if so, prejudicial, present questions of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=37581 - 2014-09-15
a lawyer’s performance was deficient and, if so, prejudicial, present questions of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=37581 - 2014-09-15
State v. Lionel N. Anderson
to the defendant are questions of law reviewed by this court de novo.” Id. Because we are satisfied from our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19890 - 2005-12-11
to the defendant are questions of law reviewed by this court de novo.” Id. Because we are satisfied from our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19890 - 2005-12-11
[PDF]
WI 19
are reviewed de novo. In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Tully, 2005 WI 100, ¶25, 283 Wis. 2d 124, 699
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48354 - 2014-09-15
are reviewed de novo. In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Tully, 2005 WI 100, ¶25, 283 Wis. 2d 124, 699
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48354 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
with the Partnership. ¶20 Our review of a circuit court’s summary judgment decision is de novo, applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=541195 - 2022-07-06
with the Partnership. ¶20 Our review of a circuit court’s summary judgment decision is de novo, applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=541195 - 2022-07-06
[PDF]
State v. Evan Zimmerman
, which we review de novo. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d at 634. The defendant has the burden of persuasion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5901 - 2017-09-19
, which we review de novo. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d at 634. The defendant has the burden of persuasion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5901 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
WI APP 140
“The interpretation of a statute is a question of law which we review de novo.” Grosse v. Protective Life Ins. Co
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39214 - 2014-09-15
“The interpretation of a statute is a question of law which we review de novo.” Grosse v. Protective Life Ins. Co
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39214 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. William A. Schmidt
) to an undisputed set of facts. These are questions of law that we review de novo. See Swatek v. County
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16931 - 2017-09-21
) to an undisputed set of facts. These are questions of law that we review de novo. See Swatek v. County
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16931 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
review is therefore de novo. B. Under the Salinas Factors, Joinder was Proper. ¶27 WISCONSIN STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192656 - 2017-10-13
review is therefore de novo. B. Under the Salinas Factors, Joinder was Proper. ¶27 WISCONSIN STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192656 - 2017-10-13
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is constitutional presents a question of law subject to de novo review. State v. Cole, 2003 WI 112, ¶10, 264 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116170 - 2017-09-21
is constitutional presents a question of law subject to de novo review. State v. Cole, 2003 WI 112, ¶10, 264 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116170 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
; whether counsel’s conduct constitutes ineffective assistance is a question of law, which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=253798 - 2020-02-11
; whether counsel’s conduct constitutes ineffective assistance is a question of law, which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=253798 - 2020-02-11