Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27941 - 27950 of 29713 for des.
Search results 27941 - 27950 of 29713 for des.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of a statute is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Setagord, 211 Wis. 2d 397, 405-06, 565
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=419582 - 2021-09-02
of a statute is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Setagord, 211 Wis. 2d 397, 405-06, 565
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=419582 - 2021-09-02
[PDF]
Forest County v. Wesley S. Goode
of law we review de novo. Eastman v. City of Madison, 117 Wis.2d 106, 112, 342 N.W.2d 764, 767 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11844 - 2017-09-21
of law we review de novo. Eastman v. City of Madison, 117 Wis.2d 106, 112, 342 N.W.2d 764, 767 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11844 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
(interpretation of a constitutional provision is a question of law reviewed de novo); see also Predick v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=630656 - 2023-03-09
(interpretation of a constitutional provision is a question of law reviewed de novo); see also Predick v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=630656 - 2023-03-09
[PDF]
Leonard Goetzka v. City of Black River Falls
judgment, we employ the same methodology as the circuit court and our review is de novo. Green Spring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20000 - 2017-09-21
judgment, we employ the same methodology as the circuit court and our review is de novo. Green Spring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20000 - 2017-09-21
Wisconsin Court System
issued an order granting the original action petition filed by Voces de la Frontera, Inc. A copy
/index.jsp
issued an order granting the original action petition filed by Voces de la Frontera, Inc. A copy
/index.jsp
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. DISCUSSION ¶8 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo. Chapman v. B.C. Ziegler & Co., 2013 WI App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=399777 - 2021-07-27
. DISCUSSION ¶8 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo. Chapman v. B.C. Ziegler & Co., 2013 WI App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=399777 - 2021-07-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a statute and apply it to undisputed facts. This task presents questions of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=341464 - 2021-03-02
a statute and apply it to undisputed facts. This task presents questions of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=341464 - 2021-03-02
David Arnold v. Cincinnati Insurance Company
. § 802.08(2). We apply the same methodology as the trial court and review de novo the grant or denial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6888 - 2005-03-31
. § 802.08(2). We apply the same methodology as the trial court and review de novo the grant or denial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6888 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Joseph F. Volk
of law which we review de novo. State v. Murdock, 2000 WI App 170, ¶18, 238 Wis. 2d 301, 617 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4692 - 2017-09-19
of law which we review de novo. State v. Murdock, 2000 WI App 170, ¶18, 238 Wis. 2d 301, 617 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4692 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
reference additional facts as needed below. Discussion ¶12 We review summary judgment de novo, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30884 - 2005-03-31
reference additional facts as needed below. Discussion ¶12 We review summary judgment de novo, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30884 - 2005-03-31