Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27941 - 27950 of 29823 for des.

State v. Gregory L.S.
interpretation is a question of law that we decide de novo. Minuteman, Inc. v. Alexander, 147 Wis. 2d 842, 853
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4342 - 2005-03-31

Allan Hoffmann v. Wisconsin Electric Power Company
., Milwaukee, and Scott Lawrence and Lawrence & Des Rochers, S.C., St. Nazianz, and oral argument by Lynn R
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16428 - 2005-03-31

State v. Brian D. Robins
review de novo. State v. Jensen, 2000 WI 84, ¶12, 236 Wis. 2d 521, 613 N.W.2d 170. The sufficiency
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16431 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
omitted). The interpretation of the statute presents a question of law, which we review de novo. Town
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195380 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Paul D. Hoppe
alcohol withdrawal. ¶70 Considered in its totality, and applying a de novo standard of review
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16407 - 2017-09-21

Village of Trempealeau v. Mike R. Mikrut
that we review de novo. Kywanda F., 200 Wis. 2d at 32-33. III. DISCUSSION ¶8 Article VII
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16768 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Frontsheet
conclusions of law de novo. Id. ¶21 We accept the referee's findings of fact and reject Attorney
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=112689 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of a statute is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Setagord, 211 Wis. 2d 397, 405-06, 565
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=419582 - 2021-09-02

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
are questions of law, and our standard of review therefore is de novo. Bryhan v. Pink, 2006 WI App 111, ¶13
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=180616 - 2017-09-21

State v. Sylvester Sigarroa
constitutional muster is a question of law to be decided de novo. Roberts, 196 Wis. 2d at 452. This case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6271 - 2005-03-31