Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27941 - 27950 of 29823 for des.
Search results 27941 - 27950 of 29823 for des.
State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
to the defendant are questions of law reviewed by this court de novo. Id.; State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d 628, 634
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17519 - 2005-03-31
to the defendant are questions of law reviewed by this court de novo. Id.; State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d 628, 634
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17519 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jesse Franklin
to the defendant are questions of law reviewed by this court de novo. Id.; State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d 628, 634
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17490 - 2005-03-31
to the defendant are questions of law reviewed by this court de novo. Id.; State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d 628, 634
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17490 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI 42
, and we review the referee’s conclusions of law de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=885190 - 2025-04-11
, and we review the referee’s conclusions of law de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=885190 - 2025-04-11
[PDF]
WI APP 66
that we review de novo. Id., ¶15. No. 2022AP1749 18 ¶39 In support of its judicial bias
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=726837 - 2024-01-18
that we review de novo. Id., ¶15. No. 2022AP1749 18 ¶39 In support of its judicial bias
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=726837 - 2024-01-18
[PDF]
Frontsheet
standard for ineffective assistance of counsel is a question of law, which we review de novo. Id
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241676 - 2019-06-05
standard for ineffective assistance of counsel is a question of law, which we review de novo. Id
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241676 - 2019-06-05
2007 WI APP 146
principles to those facts de novo.” Id. (citations omitted). ¶8 In reviewing whether probable cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28959 - 2007-06-26
principles to those facts de novo.” Id. (citations omitted). ¶8 In reviewing whether probable cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28959 - 2007-06-26
City of Racine v. Waste Facility Siting Board
reviews de novo. See Lake City Corp. v. City of Mequon, 207 Wis. 2d 156, 162-63, 558 N.W.2d 100 (1997
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17099 - 2005-03-31
reviews de novo. See Lake City Corp. v. City of Mequon, 207 Wis. 2d 156, 162-63, 558 N.W.2d 100 (1997
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17099 - 2005-03-31
2010 WI APP 63
review de novo. See Walter v. Cessna Aircraft Co., 121 Wis. 2d 221, 231, 358 N.W.2d 816 (Ct. App. 1984
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47759 - 2010-05-25
review de novo. See Walter v. Cessna Aircraft Co., 121 Wis. 2d 221, 231, 358 N.W.2d 816 (Ct. App. 1984
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47759 - 2010-05-25
State v. Peter G. Tkacz
jeopardy rights involves a question of law which this court reviews de novo. See id. at 6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12308 - 2005-03-31
jeopardy rights involves a question of law which this court reviews de novo. See id. at 6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12308 - 2005-03-31
State v. Sally Ann Minniecheske
counsel's performance was deficient and prejudicial are questions of law we review de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14119 - 2005-03-31
counsel's performance was deficient and prejudicial are questions of law we review de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14119 - 2005-03-31