Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27941 - 27950 of 58510 for speedy trial.
Search results 27941 - 27950 of 58510 for speedy trial.
COURT OF APPEALS
to challenge the effectiveness of his trial attorney’s performance. We denied the petition because Rogers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35198 - 2009-01-12
to challenge the effectiveness of his trial attorney’s performance. We denied the petition because Rogers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35198 - 2009-01-12
[PDF]
NOTICE
, the Meises challenge evidentiary rulings made by the trial court in an eminent domain proceeding brought
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30501 - 2014-09-15
, the Meises challenge evidentiary rulings made by the trial court in an eminent domain proceeding brought
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30501 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
. The trial court imposed the maximum sentence available: five years’ initial confinement and five years
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98930 - 2014-09-15
. The trial court imposed the maximum sentence available: five years’ initial confinement and five years
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98930 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
¶8 Sentencing is committed to the trial court’s discretion. State v. Wickstrom, 118 Wis. 2d 339
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30467 - 2014-09-15
¶8 Sentencing is committed to the trial court’s discretion. State v. Wickstrom, 118 Wis. 2d 339
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30467 - 2014-09-15
Richard F. Salewske v. Leroy W. Depies
commission. He argues that the trial court erroneously interpreted his listing contract with LeRoy and June
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16261 - 2005-03-31
commission. He argues that the trial court erroneously interpreted his listing contract with LeRoy and June
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16261 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
attorney was ineffective by failing to challenge the effectiveness of his trial attorney’s performance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35198 - 2014-09-15
attorney was ineffective by failing to challenge the effectiveness of his trial attorney’s performance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35198 - 2014-09-15
State v. James W. Pusel
) whether the trial court erred when it automatically admitted the intoxilyzer test result because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9575 - 2005-03-31
) whether the trial court erred when it automatically admitted the intoxilyzer test result because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9575 - 2005-03-31
State v. Frank J. Geniesse
the fruits of his arrest should be suppressed. We conclude that the trial court correctly decided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9759 - 2005-03-31
the fruits of his arrest should be suppressed. We conclude that the trial court correctly decided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9759 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Anderson argues that the evidence presented at trial was insufficient to support the jury’s guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162500 - 2017-09-21
Anderson argues that the evidence presented at trial was insufficient to support the jury’s guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162500 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 19, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
was first able to contact Campbell and informed him that he was supposed to be in custody. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27488 - 2006-12-18
was first able to contact Campbell and informed him that he was supposed to be in custody. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27488 - 2006-12-18