Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27951 - 27960 of 30059 for de.
Search results 27951 - 27960 of 30059 for de.
[PDF]
NOTICE
N.W.2d 687 (1996). In Wisconsin, we review those determinations de novo. See id. at 18
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39505 - 2014-09-15
N.W.2d 687 (1996). In Wisconsin, we review those determinations de novo. See id. at 18
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39505 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
review questions of statutory interpretation de novo. State v. Stenklyft, 2005 WI 71, ¶¶7, 11, 281 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32345 - 2014-09-15
review questions of statutory interpretation de novo. State v. Stenklyft, 2005 WI 71, ¶¶7, 11, 281 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32345 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
decision to select the City’s offer. On our de novo review of the arbitration award, we similarly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143952 - 2017-09-21
decision to select the City’s offer. On our de novo review of the arbitration award, we similarly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143952 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Tony M. Smith
is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Wills, 193 Wis. 2d 273, 277, 533 N.W.2d 165 (1995
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16974 - 2017-09-21
is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Wills, 193 Wis. 2d 273, 277, 533 N.W.2d 165 (1995
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16974 - 2017-09-21
Wisconsin Central Limited v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
construction of § 76.09, Stats., a question of law, which we review de novo. See State v. Setagord, 211 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15032 - 2005-03-31
construction of § 76.09, Stats., a question of law, which we review de novo. See State v. Setagord, 211 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15032 - 2005-03-31
Frontsheet
the circuit court's findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous. Id. We then review de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95267 - 2013-04-08
the circuit court's findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous. Id. We then review de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95267 - 2013-04-08
State v. John Allen
, would entitle the defendant to relief. This is a question of law that we review de novo. Bentley, 201
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16673 - 2005-03-31
, would entitle the defendant to relief. This is a question of law that we review de novo. Bentley, 201
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16673 - 2005-03-31
Village of Trempealeau v. Mike R. Mikrut
that we review de novo. Kywanda F., 200 Wis. 2d at 32-33. III. DISCUSSION ¶8 Article VII
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16748 - 2005-03-31
that we review de novo. Kywanda F., 200 Wis. 2d at 32-33. III. DISCUSSION ¶8 Article VII
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16748 - 2005-03-31
Frontsheet
findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. In re
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48354 - 2010-03-23
findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. In re
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48354 - 2010-03-23
[PDF]
David Pagel v. Robert Gaffney
of law that appellate courts review de novo. Prosser v. Lueck, 225 Wis.2d 126, 136, 592 N.W.2d 178
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14759 - 2017-09-21
of law that appellate courts review de novo. Prosser v. Lueck, 225 Wis.2d 126, 136, 592 N.W.2d 178
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14759 - 2017-09-21