Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27951 - 27960 of 30178 for de.
Search results 27951 - 27960 of 30178 for de.
[PDF]
Frontsheet
N.W.2d 125. We review the referee's conclusions of law on a de novo basis. Id. We determine
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=254758 - 2020-02-20
N.W.2d 125. We review the referee's conclusions of law on a de novo basis. Id. We determine
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=254758 - 2020-02-20
[PDF]
Aldene Kannenberg v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
. Kannenberg argues that we should give no weight to LIRC’s interpretation of the statute, employing a de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12003 - 2017-09-21
. Kannenberg argues that we should give no weight to LIRC’s interpretation of the statute, employing a de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12003 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
omitted). The interpretation of the statute presents a question of law, which we review de novo. Town
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195380 - 2017-09-21
omitted). The interpretation of the statute presents a question of law, which we review de novo. Town
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195380 - 2017-09-21
University of Wisconsin Medical Foundation, Inc. v. City of Madison
judgment de novo, owing no deference to the trial court’s decision. Waters v. United States Fid. & Guar
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5309 - 2005-03-31
judgment de novo, owing no deference to the trial court’s decision. Waters v. United States Fid. & Guar
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5309 - 2005-03-31
State v. Teresa L. Bellows
interpretation is a question of law which this court decides de novo without deference to the decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12309 - 2005-03-31
interpretation is a question of law which this court decides de novo without deference to the decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12309 - 2005-03-31
Frontsheet
findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. In re
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48354 - 2010-03-23
findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. In re
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48354 - 2010-03-23
State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
to the defendant are questions of law reviewed by this court de novo. Id.; State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d 628, 634
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17516 - 2005-03-31
to the defendant are questions of law reviewed by this court de novo. Id.; State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d 628, 634
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17516 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Teresa L. Bellows
this court decides de novo without deference to the decision of the trial court. See Rolo v. Goers, 174
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12309 - 2017-09-21
this court decides de novo without deference to the decision of the trial court. See Rolo v. Goers, 174
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12309 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of law that we review de novo. See id. Factual findings made by the trial court in its determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79065 - 2014-09-15
of law that we review de novo. See id. Factual findings made by the trial court in its determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79065 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. James M. Evers
; Franklin, 111 Wis.2d at 687-88, 331 N.W.2d at 637. This court's de novo review is aided by the fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13979 - 2014-09-15
; Franklin, 111 Wis.2d at 687-88, 331 N.W.2d at 637. This court's de novo review is aided by the fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13979 - 2014-09-15