Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27951 - 27960 of 29823 for des.
Search results 27951 - 27960 of 29823 for des.
State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
to the defendant are questions of law reviewed by this court de novo. Id.; State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d 628, 634
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17520 - 2005-03-31
to the defendant are questions of law reviewed by this court de novo. Id.; State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d 628, 634
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17520 - 2005-03-31
2007 WI APP 8
We review the circuit court’s grant of summary judgment de novo, employing the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27357 - 2007-01-30
We review the circuit court’s grant of summary judgment de novo, employing the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27357 - 2007-01-30
COURT OF APPEALS
and, if so, prejudicial, present questions of law that we review de novo. Johnson, 153 Wis. 2d at 128. ¶15
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37581 - 2009-07-14
and, if so, prejudicial, present questions of law that we review de novo. Johnson, 153 Wis. 2d at 128. ¶15
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37581 - 2009-07-14
2009 WI APP 143
that we review de novo. See State v. Hoover, 2003 WI App 117, ¶29, 265 Wis. 2d 607, 666 N.W.2d 74. So
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40095 - 2009-10-27
that we review de novo. See State v. Hoover, 2003 WI App 117, ¶29, 265 Wis. 2d 607, 666 N.W.2d 74. So
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40095 - 2009-10-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
evidence or a dispositive issue in the case,” which is “require[d]” in order to “exclu[de] … a juror
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218008 - 2018-08-22
evidence or a dispositive issue in the case,” which is “require[d]” in order to “exclu[de] … a juror
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218008 - 2018-08-22
[PDF]
State v. James M. Evers
; Franklin, 111 Wis.2d at 687-88, 331 N.W.2d at 637. This court's de novo review is aided by the fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13979 - 2014-09-15
; Franklin, 111 Wis.2d at 687-88, 331 N.W.2d at 637. This court's de novo review is aided by the fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13979 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
one reasonable inference, and therefore these are determinations for this court to make de novo
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=556756 - 2022-08-18
one reasonable inference, and therefore these are determinations for this court to make de novo
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=556756 - 2022-08-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
reviews de novo. See Outagamie County v. Melanie L., 2013 WI 67, ¶39, 349 Wis. 2d 148, 833 N.W.2d 607
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=704579 - 2023-09-20
reviews de novo. See Outagamie County v. Melanie L., 2013 WI 67, ¶39, 349 Wis. 2d 148, 833 N.W.2d 607
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=704579 - 2023-09-20
2007 WI App 259
at issue. ¶42 Again, our standard of review is de novo as this involves the interpretation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30842 - 2007-07-30
at issue. ¶42 Again, our standard of review is de novo as this involves the interpretation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30842 - 2007-07-30
State v. Kelley L. Hauk
. APPEAL from judgments and orders of the circuit court for Grant County: robert p. van de hey, Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4096 - 2005-03-31
. APPEAL from judgments and orders of the circuit court for Grant County: robert p. van de hey, Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4096 - 2005-03-31