Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27961 - 27970 of 30177 for de.

COURT OF APPEALS
the motion raised sufficient facts to get a hearing is de novo. State v. Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d 303, 310, 548
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125544 - 2014-11-03

COURT OF APPEALS
.2d 687 (1996). In Wisconsin, we review those determinations de novo. See id. at 18. The State also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39505 - 2009-08-17

[PDF] City of Madison v. State of Wisconsin Department of Workforce Development
that we review de novo. See State ex rel. DPI v. DILHR, 68 Wis. 2d 677, 680-84, 229 N.W.2d 591, 593-95
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4190 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Frontsheet
. § 895.529, which presents a question of law that we review de novo. Noffke ex rel. Swenson v. Bakke, 2009
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=368349 - 2021-07-07

[PDF] WI APP 146
erroneous. Second, we review the application of constitutional principles to those facts de novo.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28959 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] WI App 48
, our review is de novo, and we owe no deference to the circuit court. Yahnke v. Carson, 2000 WI 74
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=382518 - 2021-08-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
presents a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d 303, 310, 548 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=491819 - 2022-03-08

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
by the circuit court constitute reasonable suspicion is a question of law we review de novo. State v. Young
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1092254 - 2026-03-17

[PDF] State v. Alan L. Radke
. This is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Lindsey, 203 Wis. 2d 423, 432, 554 N.W.2d 215 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4174 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Thomas H. Bush
. The constitutionality of a statute is a question of law which we review de novo. State v. Randall, 192 Wis. 2d 800
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18883 - 2017-09-21