Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27961 - 27970 of 29827 for des.
Search results 27961 - 27970 of 29827 for des.
COURT OF APPEALS
of statutory interpretation de novo. State v. Stenklyft, 2005 WI 71, ¶¶7, 11, 281 Wis. 2d 484, 697 N.W.2d 769
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32345 - 2008-04-07
of statutory interpretation de novo. State v. Stenklyft, 2005 WI 71, ¶¶7, 11, 281 Wis. 2d 484, 697 N.W.2d 769
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32345 - 2008-04-07
[PDF]
Douglas R. Werdehoff v. General Star Indemnity Company
consider the issues de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis.2d 304, 315-16, 401 N.W.2d 816
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14227 - 2014-09-15
consider the issues de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis.2d 304, 315-16, 401 N.W.2d 816
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14227 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
entitle the defendant to an evidentiary hearing presents a question of law that we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=283044 - 2020-09-01
entitle the defendant to an evidentiary hearing presents a question of law that we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=283044 - 2020-09-01
[PDF]
State v. Dennis H.
of law which this court reviews de novo. State v. Janssen, 219 Wis. 2d 362, 370, 580 N.W.2d 260 (1998
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16477 - 2017-09-21
of law which this court reviews de novo. State v. Janssen, 219 Wis. 2d 362, 370, 580 N.W.2d 260 (1998
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16477 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Gerald P.
limits of § 48.422(2), is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. Matthew S., 282 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20442 - 2017-09-21
limits of § 48.422(2), is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. Matthew S., 282 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20442 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI 27
will not be set aside unless clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94772 - 2014-09-15
will not be set aside unless clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94772 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in the law presents a legal question to be reviewed de novo. State ex rel. Robinson v. Town of Bristol
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=347156 - 2021-03-18
in the law presents a legal question to be reviewed de novo. State ex rel. Robinson v. Town of Bristol
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=347156 - 2021-03-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
constitutes ineffective assistance is a question of law, which we review de novo.” Id. A. Golden rule
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1043058 - 2025-11-25
constitutes ineffective assistance is a question of law, which we review de novo.” Id. A. Golden rule
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1043058 - 2025-11-25
Paul Abraham v. General Casualty Company of Wisconsin
the application of a statute to a particular set of facts is de novo. Therefore, we examine this issue
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17066 - 2005-03-31
the application of a statute to a particular set of facts is de novo. Therefore, we examine this issue
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17066 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
the circuit court’s factual findings unless they are clearly erroneous. We review de novo whether those facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118853 - 2014-08-06
the circuit court’s factual findings unless they are clearly erroneous. We review de novo whether those facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118853 - 2014-08-06