Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27961 - 27970 of 34007 for dismissal.
Search results 27961 - 27970 of 34007 for dismissal.
[PDF]
SC Table of Pending Cases - Added recent decisions in 2015AP79, 2015AP959-CR and 2015AP1782-CR
developments in the case show that he is entitled to a defense? 04/06/2016 REVW Petition dismissed 04
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=189752 - 2017-09-21
developments in the case show that he is entitled to a defense? 04/06/2016 REVW Petition dismissed 04
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=189752 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
SC Table of Pending Cases - added decisions in case nos. 2011AP2698-CR, 2011AP2905-CR and 2012AP392
) (a trial court has discretion to dismiss a refusal charge after a defendant pleads guilty to a charge
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107117 - 2017-09-21
) (a trial court has discretion to dismiss a refusal charge after a defendant pleads guilty to a charge
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107117 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Oral Argument Synopses - September 2011
during the trial court proceedings. The defendant filed three motions to dismiss, all of which were
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70483 - 2014-09-15
during the trial court proceedings. The defendant filed three motions to dismiss, all of which were
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70483 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Oral Argument Synopses - January
.” The circuit court agreed, dismissing the case after concluding that Magnuson- Moss applies only when
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=920 - 2017-09-20
.” The circuit court agreed, dismissing the case after concluding that Magnuson- Moss applies only when
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=920 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT
used by [the plaintiff] as a residence?" Was the dismissal of plaintiff's Wis. Stat. § 425.107
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=349273 - 2021-03-22
used by [the plaintiff] as a residence?" Was the dismissal of plaintiff's Wis. Stat. § 425.107
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=349273 - 2021-03-22
[PDF]
Frontsheet
We remanded for a new trial but the case was dismissed on the prosecutor's motion. 3. The 2011
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=258180 - 2020-04-17
We remanded for a new trial but the case was dismissed on the prosecutor's motion. 3. The 2011
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=258180 - 2020-04-17
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
significantly. 6 ¶12 After the Haldersons rested their case at trial, NSP moved to dismiss the Haldersons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=216059 - 2018-07-24
significantly. 6 ¶12 After the Haldersons rested their case at trial, NSP moved to dismiss the Haldersons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=216059 - 2018-07-24
Ray Mallo v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
the decision of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the DOR and dismissing this action. I
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16448 - 2005-03-31
the decision of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the DOR and dismissing this action. I
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16448 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of No. 2022AP151-CR 18 thirty-six months, the State would move to dismiss each count with prejudice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=653786 - 2023-05-09
of No. 2022AP151-CR 18 thirty-six months, the State would move to dismiss each count with prejudice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=653786 - 2023-05-09
[PDF]
WI App 70
provisions of WIS. STAT. ch. 551. The appellants filed a motion to dismiss the orders, arguing that, under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=882268 - 2025-01-24
provisions of WIS. STAT. ch. 551. The appellants filed a motion to dismiss the orders, arguing that, under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=882268 - 2025-01-24