Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27961 - 27970 of 66139 for motion to dismiss.

[PDF] FORM SUMMARY
a plaintiff may request the court to vacate a dismissal, enter a judgment of eviction based upon
/formdisplay/SC-5400As_summary.pdf?formNumber=SC-5400As&formType=Summary&formatId=2&language=en - 2025-04-02

[PDF] WI App 62
pursuant to the terms of the Agreement. ¶11 The trial court also heard postverdict motions addressing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36150 - 2014-09-15

2009 WI App 62
to the terms of the Agreement. ¶11 The trial court also heard postverdict motions addressing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36150 - 2009-05-26

[PDF] State v. Lance Terry Konrath
. Wimmer, Judge, denied Lance Terry Konrath's ("Konrath") motion to vacate the order for seizure of his
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17110 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Kevin Harris
an order of the Walworth County Circuit Court, Michael S. Gibbs, Judge, granting the motion
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16670 - 2017-09-21

State v. Lance Terry Konrath
. The Waukesha County Circuit Court, Joseph E. Wimmer, Judge, denied Lance Terry Konrath's ("Konrath") motion
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17110 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Thomas J. Woznicki v. Dennis W. Erickson
, the District Attorney dismissed the case against Woznicki. Subsequently, Woznicki moved the circuit court
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16957 - 2017-09-21

State v. Harris D. Byers
the court of appeals and remand the matter to the circuit court for dismissal of the petition. I ¶2
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16356 - 2005-03-31

Thomas J. Woznicki v. Dennis W. Erickson
. In July 1994, the District Attorney dismissed the case against Woznicki. Subsequently, Woznicki moved
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16957 - 2005-03-31

State v. Harris D. Byers
the court of appeals and remand the matter to the circuit court for dismissal of the petition. I ¶2
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17549 - 2005-03-31