Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27961 - 27970 of 46101 for paternity test paper work.
Search results 27961 - 27970 of 46101 for paternity test paper work.
State v. Deandra S. Carter
occurred, courts apply a reasonable person test: if a reasonable person would have believed he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12704 - 2005-03-31
occurred, courts apply a reasonable person test: if a reasonable person would have believed he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12704 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
to constitutional principles. Id. What constitutes reasonable suspicion is a common sense test. State v. Waldner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33774 - 2008-08-20
to constitutional principles. Id. What constitutes reasonable suspicion is a common sense test. State v. Waldner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33774 - 2008-08-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
the undisputed law that the test for a valid Terry2 stop is “reasonableness.” This discussion is all fine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33033 - 2014-09-15
the undisputed law that the test for a valid Terry2 stop is “reasonableness.” This discussion is all fine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33033 - 2014-09-15
Mark Kypke v. Atterbury
498 (Ct. App. 1992)). The “reasonable diligence” test is objective. We therefore consider when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6270 - 2005-03-31
498 (Ct. App. 1992)). The “reasonable diligence” test is objective. We therefore consider when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6270 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Ruth E. Peterson
one drink. Peterson failed field sobriety tests and Funk arrested her for operating a motor vehicle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7624 - 2017-09-19
one drink. Peterson failed field sobriety tests and Funk arrested her for operating a motor vehicle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7624 - 2017-09-19
State v. David Lee Greenwood
from those facts, reasonably warrant that intrusion." The test is objective: [T]he issue is whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12543 - 2005-03-31
from those facts, reasonably warrant that intrusion." The test is objective: [T]he issue is whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12543 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
tests. She was arrested. Her blood was drawn pursuant to a warrant, and her blood-alcohol
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=995116 - 2025-08-13
tests. She was arrested. Her blood was drawn pursuant to a warrant, and her blood-alcohol
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=995116 - 2025-08-13
Anthony R. Phillips v. Kenneth Morgan
factor, the test is whether reasonable minds could arrive at the same conclusion reached
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12779 - 2005-03-31
factor, the test is whether reasonable minds could arrive at the same conclusion reached
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12779 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
(1988). The test is not whether counsel or this court expects the argument to prevail. Our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=604120 - 2023-01-04
(1988). The test is not whether counsel or this court expects the argument to prevail. Our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=604120 - 2023-01-04
COURT OF APPEALS
source omitted). The determination of reasonableness is a common sense test. The crucial question
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36689 - 2009-06-08
source omitted). The determination of reasonableness is a common sense test. The crucial question
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36689 - 2009-06-08