Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27961 - 27970 of 46087 for paternity test paper work.
Search results 27961 - 27970 of 46087 for paternity test paper work.
[PDF]
State v. Linda M. Henthorn
No. 97-2235-CR(D) DYKMAN, P.J. (dissenting). If we are to use the “moving picture” test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12830 - 2017-09-21
No. 97-2235-CR(D) DYKMAN, P.J. (dissenting). If we are to use the “moving picture” test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12830 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. “The evidentiary test on certiorari review is the substantial evidence test, under which we determine whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72493 - 2014-09-15
. “The evidentiary test on certiorari review is the substantial evidence test, under which we determine whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72493 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
tests and was arrested. ¶3 Vue read Doule the Informing the Accused form while Doule was seated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184458 - 2017-09-21
tests and was arrested. ¶3 Vue read Doule the Informing the Accused form while Doule was seated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184458 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. William H. Roberts
and glassy. Roberts did not cooperate and refused to take any chemical test to determine if he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4089 - 2017-09-20
and glassy. Roberts did not cooperate and refused to take any chemical test to determine if he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4089 - 2017-09-20
State v. Matthew T. Doughty
of the circumstances. Id., ¶38. This test requires balancing the personal characteristics of the defendant against
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6617 - 2005-03-31
of the circumstances. Id., ¶38. This test requires balancing the personal characteristics of the defendant against
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6617 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Francis E. Altman
prong of the Strickland test is satisfied where the attorney’s error is of such magnitude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26043 - 2017-09-21
prong of the Strickland test is satisfied where the attorney’s error is of such magnitude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26043 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
. ¶10 The prejudice prong of the Strickland test is satisfied where the attorney’s error
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52099 - 2014-09-15
. ¶10 The prejudice prong of the Strickland test is satisfied where the attorney’s error
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52099 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
.” Lukens testified that after the stop but before they performed the field sobriety tests, they learned
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41714 - 2014-09-15
.” Lukens testified that after the stop but before they performed the field sobriety tests, they learned
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41714 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
The test also revealed the presence of citalopram (120ng/mL) and norcialopram (180ng/mL) in Peltier’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35805 - 2014-09-15
The test also revealed the presence of citalopram (120ng/mL) and norcialopram (180ng/mL) in Peltier’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35805 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. The motion alleged that the other acts were admissible under the test set forth in State v. Sullivan, 216
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250262 - 2019-11-14
. The motion alleged that the other acts were admissible under the test set forth in State v. Sullivan, 216
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250262 - 2019-11-14