Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27971 - 27980 of 30072 for de.
Search results 27971 - 27980 of 30072 for de.
[PDF]
State v. Sally Ann Minniecheske
of whether counsel's performance was deficient and prejudicial are questions of law we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14119 - 2014-09-15
of whether counsel's performance was deficient and prejudicial are questions of law we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14119 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Evan Zimmerman
, which we review de novo. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d at 634. The defendant has the burden of persuasion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5901 - 2017-09-19
, which we review de novo. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d at 634. The defendant has the burden of persuasion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5901 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
reviews de novo. See Outagamie County v. Melanie L., 2013 WI 67, ¶39, 349 Wis. 2d 148, 833 N.W.2d 607
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=704579 - 2023-09-20
reviews de novo. See Outagamie County v. Melanie L., 2013 WI 67, ¶39, 349 Wis. 2d 148, 833 N.W.2d 607
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=704579 - 2023-09-20
State v. Leo E. Wanta
to the sufficiency of the evidence necessary to support a verdict de novo, applying the same standards as the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13586 - 2005-03-31
to the sufficiency of the evidence necessary to support a verdict de novo, applying the same standards as the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13586 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Frontsheet
N.W.2d 125. We review the referee's conclusions of law on a de novo basis. Id. We determine
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=254758 - 2020-02-20
N.W.2d 125. We review the referee's conclusions of law on a de novo basis. Id. We determine
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=254758 - 2020-02-20
[PDF]
State v. Kathleen A. Benoit
, which we review de novo. Id. at 140. ¶39 In this case, the parties agree that the procedure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18016 - 2017-09-21
, which we review de novo. Id. at 140. ¶39 In this case, the parties agree that the procedure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18016 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was deficient and whether it prejudiced the parent are questions of law we review de novo. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118288 - 2014-09-15
was deficient and whether it prejudiced the parent are questions of law we review de novo. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118288 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Joseph J. Guerard
that we review de novo. III. DISCUSSION A. Corroboration of Statements Against Penal
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16669 - 2017-09-21
that we review de novo. III. DISCUSSION A. Corroboration of Statements Against Penal
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16669 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
constitutes ineffective assistance is a question of law, which we review de novo.” Id. ¶20 To demonstrate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=632790 - 2023-03-16
constitutes ineffective assistance is a question of law, which we review de novo.” Id. ¶20 To demonstrate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=632790 - 2023-03-16
[PDF]
State v. Allen Tony Davis
fact that this court reviews de novo. See State v. Fawcett, 145 Wis.2d 244, 249, 426 N.W.2d 91, 93
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13443 - 2017-09-21
fact that this court reviews de novo. See State v. Fawcett, 145 Wis.2d 244, 249, 426 N.W.2d 91, 93
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13443 - 2017-09-21