Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27971 - 27980 of 30072 for de.

[PDF] WI 11
, the review is de novo. State v. T.J. Int'l, Inc., 2001 WI 76, ¶20, 244 Wis. 2d 481, 628 N.W.2d 774
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35373 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Wayne A. Briesemeister v. Philip Lehner
to judgment as a matter of law. WIS. STAT. § 802.08(2) (2003-04).5 We review summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25691 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] City of Madison v. State of Wisconsin Department of Workforce Development
that we review de novo. See State ex rel. DPI v. DILHR, 68 Wis. 2d 677, 680-84, 229 N.W.2d 591, 593-95
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4190 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] WI App 259
. ¶42 Again, our standard of review is de novo as this involves the interpretation of the costs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30842 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Jesus Ortega, Jr. v. Gary R. McCaughtry
in the preceding paragraph. Since we apply the substantial evidence test de novo in this appeal, Ortega has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13125 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI APP 74
. Dutch, 161 Wis. 2d 28, 33, 467 N.W.2d 192 (Ct. App. 1991). We review de novo whether those facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49968 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] WI App 32
assistance was ineffective is a question of law, which we review de novo. Id. A. Deficient Performance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=353014 - 2021-06-14

[PDF] State v. Leo E. Wanta
challenges to the sufficiency of the evidence necessary to support a verdict de novo, applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13586 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, whether a constitutional error is harmless is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Beamon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=806115 - 2024-05-29

[PDF] State v. Antonio V. Blanco
it passes statutory and constitutional muster are questions of law subject to de novo review.” Id. at 137
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14735 - 2017-09-21