Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27971 - 27980 of 29823 for des.

[PDF] State v. Paul D. Hoppe
alcohol withdrawal. ¶70 Considered in its totality, and applying a de novo standard of review
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16407 - 2017-09-21

Village of Trempealeau v. Mike R. Mikrut
that we review de novo. Kywanda F., 200 Wis. 2d at 32-33. III. DISCUSSION ¶8 Article VII
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16768 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Frontsheet
conclusions of law de novo. Id. ¶21 We accept the referee's findings of fact and reject Attorney
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=112689 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of a statute is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Setagord, 211 Wis. 2d 397, 405-06, 565
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=419582 - 2021-09-02

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
are questions of law, and our standard of review therefore is de novo. Bryhan v. Pink, 2006 WI App 111, ¶13
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=180616 - 2017-09-21

State v. Sylvester Sigarroa
constitutional muster is a question of law to be decided de novo. Roberts, 196 Wis. 2d at 452. This case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6271 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
findings unless they are clearly erroneous. We review de novo whether those facts fulfill the legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118853 - 2014-09-15

WI App 49 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2014AP2238-CR Complete Title...
which we review de novo[.]” Id. (citations omitted). ¶24 The circuit court concluded the State had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141620 - 2015-06-23

David Pagel v. Robert Gaffney
of § 807.01 Stats., is a question of law that appellate courts review de novo. Prosser v. Lueck, 225 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14726 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
the motion raised sufficient facts to get a hearing is de novo. State v. Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d 303, 310, 548
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125544 - 2014-11-03