Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27981 - 27990 of 83927 for case search.
Search results 27981 - 27990 of 83927 for case search.
[PDF]
State v. Rick Pease, Jr.
concluded, “For reasons not related to the merits, this case is dismissed,” rather than repeating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18320 - 2017-09-21
concluded, “For reasons not related to the merits, this case is dismissed,” rather than repeating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18320 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
’ extended supervision, consecutive to the sentence she currently was serving in a Waukesha county case. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43959 - 2009-12-01
’ extended supervision, consecutive to the sentence she currently was serving in a Waukesha county case. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43959 - 2009-12-01
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that the case cannot be dismissed pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 799.22. On December 16, 2015, the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=172698 - 2017-09-21
that the case cannot be dismissed pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 799.22. On December 16, 2015, the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=172698 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
case that her right to counsel had been violated and shifted the burden to the State to show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79722 - 2014-09-15
case that her right to counsel had been violated and shifted the burden to the State to show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79722 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Court case No. 2011CF1361. On July 15, 2011, he was charged with one count of conspiracy to commit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105319 - 2017-09-21
Court case No. 2011CF1361. On July 15, 2011, he was charged with one count of conspiracy to commit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105319 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Marvin D. Clements
in this case?—provides the background for the issue on appeal. When the parties and jurors returned
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3168 - 2017-09-19
in this case?—provides the background for the issue on appeal. When the parties and jurors returned
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3168 - 2017-09-19
State v. Delbert L. Manke
criminal cases under § 973.08(3), Stats. Manke argues that the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9399 - 2005-03-31
criminal cases under § 973.08(3), Stats. Manke argues that the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9399 - 2005-03-31
State v. Daniel D. Brown
in the case, and under § 757.19(2)(g), because it prevented her from acting impartially in the matter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25550 - 2006-06-14
in the case, and under § 757.19(2)(g), because it prevented her from acting impartially in the matter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25550 - 2006-06-14
[PDF]
NOTICE
is the law regarding the use of PBTs. In that case, the supreme court held that a law enforcement officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35791 - 2014-09-15
is the law regarding the use of PBTs. In that case, the supreme court held that a law enforcement officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35791 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Daniel D. Brown
a significant personal interest in the case, and under § 757.19(2)(g), because it prevented her from acting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25550 - 2017-09-21
a significant personal interest in the case, and under § 757.19(2)(g), because it prevented her from acting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25550 - 2017-09-21