Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27991 - 28000 of 51576 for Cost-effective treatments https://simplemedrx.top.

State v. Reginald W. McDaniel
murder [rather than diverting the defendant to noncriminal treatment].” Id. at 330, 212 N.W.2d at 112
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9107 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Kenneth R. McGrew
had was a statutory right to a six-person jury. Because no unequal treatment occurred, § 756.06(2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4570 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Rock County DHS v. Daphnea W.
treatment of the circuit court’s default judgment is instructive to our analysis. ¶14 The Evelyn C.R
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21002 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, and that, as a condition of probation, Chic must “continue any treatment (psychological or otherwise) that he had been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143868 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
. He explains: “The evidence in the record demonstrating this disparate treatment is offered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102469 - 2013-09-30

[PDF] CA Blank Order
that, since his incarceration, he has been found mentally ill and committed for treatment. Thus, Gardner
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=699514 - 2023-09-06

Jerry L. Meana v. Wisconsin Labor and Industry Review Commission
. The medical literature has not documented this well because it is difficult to have treatment and control
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9222 - 2005-03-31

State v. Terrance C. Harris
to provide him with treatment. He further insists that he was handcuffed during the entire questioning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13441 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
“language contemplating treatment of prior security interest[s] would not be necessary and should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82143 - 2012-05-07

State v. James M. Moran
sentence.” Moran now claims that the dismissal of the charges was preferential treatment suggesting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10902 - 2005-03-31