Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27991 - 28000 of 30191 for de.

[PDF] State v. Xiong Yang
of § 885.37(1), STATS. The interpretation of a statute is a question of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8705 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Tyren E. Black
that we review de novo. County of Jefferson v. Renz, 231 Wis. 2d 293, 301, 603 N.W.2d 541 (1999
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17477 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] David Golper Co., Inc. v. Cargill, Inc
Rosman's departure. Our review of a grant of summary judgment is de novo. Reel Enterprises v. City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8011 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of a statute is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Setagord, 211 Wis. 2d 397, 405-06, 565
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=419582 - 2021-09-02

[PDF] WI APP 19
several reasons why it “ma[de] sense” that the legislature would choose to require a best interest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133315 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI 28
they are clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32375 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Alan L. Radke
. This is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Lindsey, 203 Wis. 2d 423, 432, 554 N.W.2d 215 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4174 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] University of Wisconsin Medical Foundation, Inc. v. City of Madison
appeals. ANALYSIS ¶9 We review a trial court’s grant or denial of summary judgment de novo, owing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5309 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] WI App 57
created by the loss of earnings due to illness or old age.” Mathews v. de Castro, 429 U.S. 181, 185
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=848423 - 2024-11-12

[PDF] State v. Teresa L. Bellows
this court decides de novo without deference to the decision of the trial court. See Rolo v. Goers, 174
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12309 - 2017-09-21