Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 281 - 290 of 17366 for Cost.
Search results 281 - 290 of 17366 for Cost.
[PDF]
Thomas M. Calaway v. Village of Allouez
is unreasonable because (1) the Village did not consider repair cost estimates at the time it issued the raze
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3536 - 2017-09-19
is unreasonable because (1) the Village did not consider repair cost estimates at the time it issued the raze
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3536 - 2017-09-19
2009 WI App 130
made an offer of judgment to the Stewarts “for $5000, plus taxable costs, in exchange for a general
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39799 - 2009-12-14
made an offer of judgment to the Stewarts “for $5000, plus taxable costs, in exchange for a general
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39799 - 2009-12-14
[PDF]
WI App 130
, plus taxable costs, in exchange for a general release of all claims that they may have against them
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39799 - 2014-09-15
, plus taxable costs, in exchange for a general release of all claims that they may have against them
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39799 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI APP 48
it $500 in statutory costs. Hometown appeals only the award of costs, contending that garnishment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31857 - 2014-09-15
it $500 in statutory costs. Hometown appeals only the award of costs, contending that garnishment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31857 - 2014-09-15
2008 WI APP 48
. The circuit court granted Acuity’s motion for summary judgment and awarded it $500 in statutory costs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31857 - 2008-03-18
. The circuit court granted Acuity’s motion for summary judgment and awarded it $500 in statutory costs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31857 - 2008-03-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of $182,250 plus court costs. Pursuant to a postverdict motion, the circuit court declared a mistrial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175750 - 2017-09-21
of $182,250 plus court costs. Pursuant to a postverdict motion, the circuit court declared a mistrial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175750 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI App 64
erroneously exercised its discretion by failing to distribute any portion of the reasonable cost
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=249029 - 2019-12-06
erroneously exercised its discretion by failing to distribute any portion of the reasonable cost
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=249029 - 2019-12-06
[PDF]
Virgil F. Gustafson v. Physicians Insurance Company of Wisconsin, Inc.
the prevailing defendants, Physicians Insurance Company of Wisconsin, Inc. and others (PIC), their costs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13469 - 2017-09-21
the prevailing defendants, Physicians Insurance Company of Wisconsin, Inc. and others (PIC), their costs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13469 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Frontsheet
Stern's license should be reinstated upon conditions to be discussed later. As to costs, we hold
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160976 - 2017-09-21
Stern's license should be reinstated upon conditions to be discussed later. As to costs, we hold
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160976 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
named Hoemke. Hoemke used a “replacement cost new, less depreciation” approach to valuation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213605 - 2018-05-31
named Hoemke. Hoemke used a “replacement cost new, less depreciation” approach to valuation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213605 - 2018-05-31