Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 281 - 290 of 9288 for jurors.
Search results 281 - 290 of 9288 for jurors.
COURT OF APPEALS
, presentencing discussion with the jurors was not plain error. We therefore affirm the judgment of conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137606 - 2015-04-08
, presentencing discussion with the jurors was not plain error. We therefore affirm the judgment of conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137606 - 2015-04-08
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
an allegedly unfair and biased juror, Juror 3. Jelks additionally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=967483 - 2025-06-10
an allegedly unfair and biased juror, Juror 3. Jelks additionally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=967483 - 2025-06-10
State v. Larry D. Harris
disappointed” by the delay because there were “50 jurors sitting over in Jury Management,” and suggested
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13898 - 2005-03-31
disappointed” by the delay because there were “50 jurors sitting over in Jury Management,” and suggested
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13898 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Larry D. Harris
that it was “extremely disappointed” by the delay because there were “50 jurors sitting over in Jury Management
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13898 - 2014-09-15
that it was “extremely disappointed” by the delay because there were “50 jurors sitting over in Jury Management
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13898 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Kevin D. Nelson v. Karl Heichler
rejected Nelson's attempt to impeach the verdict as the product of a juror's improper influence. Nelson's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7973 - 2017-09-19
rejected Nelson's attempt to impeach the verdict as the product of a juror's improper influence. Nelson's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7973 - 2017-09-19
State v. Kenneth E. Neu
to supplement the questioning. At one point, Neu’s attorney asked whether any jurors watched fictional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21750 - 2006-03-13
to supplement the questioning. At one point, Neu’s attorney asked whether any jurors watched fictional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21750 - 2006-03-13
[PDF]
NOTICE
. In that motion, Brandsma claimed that allowing jurors to separate presumptively deprived Brandsma of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58207 - 2014-09-15
. In that motion, Brandsma claimed that allowing jurors to separate presumptively deprived Brandsma of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58207 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
for a new trial. In that motion, Brandsma claimed that allowing jurors to separate presumptively deprived
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58207 - 2010-12-22
for a new trial. In that motion, Brandsma claimed that allowing jurors to separate presumptively deprived
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58207 - 2010-12-22
[PDF]
State v. Michael W. Lang
jurors. We reject this argument. ¶3 Lang also contends that the court erred by refusing to grant his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15510 - 2017-09-21
jurors. We reject this argument. ¶3 Lang also contends that the court erred by refusing to grant his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15510 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
his request to call jurors as witnesses at the postconviction hearing, (2) the court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238603 - 2019-04-04
his request to call jurors as witnesses at the postconviction hearing, (2) the court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238603 - 2019-04-04