Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 281 - 290 of 9541 for jurors.
Search results 281 - 290 of 9541 for jurors.
[PDF]
96-05 Amendment of SCR (Proposed) SCR Chapter 73
__________________________________________________________________ _ In the Matter of the Amendment of Supreme Court Rules: SCR chapter 73 -- ORDER Juror Use and Management
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1046 - 2017-09-20
__________________________________________________________________ _ In the Matter of the Amendment of Supreme Court Rules: SCR chapter 73 -- ORDER Juror Use and Management
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1046 - 2017-09-20
96-05 Amendment of SCR (Proposed) SCR Chapter 73
___________________________________________________________________ In the Matter of the Amendment of Supreme Court Rules: SCR chapter 73 -- ORDER Juror Use
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=1217 - 2005-03-31
___________________________________________________________________ In the Matter of the Amendment of Supreme Court Rules: SCR chapter 73 -- ORDER Juror Use
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=1217 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
96-05 Amendment of SCR (Proposed) SCR Chapter 73
__________________________________________________________________ _ In the Matter of the Amendment of Supreme Court Rules: SCR chapter 73 -- ORDER Juror Use and Management
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1217 - 2017-09-19
__________________________________________________________________ _ In the Matter of the Amendment of Supreme Court Rules: SCR chapter 73 -- ORDER Juror Use and Management
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1217 - 2017-09-19
96-05 Amendment of SCR (Proposed) SCR Chapter 73
___________________________________________________________________ In the Matter of the Amendment of Supreme Court Rules: SCR chapter 73 -- ORDER Juror Use
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=1046 - 2005-03-31
___________________________________________________________________ In the Matter of the Amendment of Supreme Court Rules: SCR chapter 73 -- ORDER Juror Use
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=1046 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, presentencing discussion with the jurors was not plain error. We therefore affirm the judgment of conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137606 - 2015-04-08
, presentencing discussion with the jurors was not plain error. We therefore affirm the judgment of conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137606 - 2015-04-08
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, presentencing discussion with the jurors was not plain error. We therefore affirm the judgment of conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=137606 - 2017-09-21
, presentencing discussion with the jurors was not plain error. We therefore affirm the judgment of conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=137606 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
an allegedly unfair and biased juror, Juror 3. Jelks additionally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=967483 - 2025-06-10
an allegedly unfair and biased juror, Juror 3. Jelks additionally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=967483 - 2025-06-10
State v. Larry D. Harris
disappointed” by the delay because there were “50 jurors sitting over in Jury Management,” and suggested
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13898 - 2005-03-31
disappointed” by the delay because there were “50 jurors sitting over in Jury Management,” and suggested
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13898 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Larry D. Harris
that it was “extremely disappointed” by the delay because there were “50 jurors sitting over in Jury Management
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13898 - 2014-09-15
that it was “extremely disappointed” by the delay because there were “50 jurors sitting over in Jury Management
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13898 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Kevin D. Nelson v. Karl Heichler
rejected Nelson's attempt to impeach the verdict as the product of a juror's improper influence. Nelson's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7973 - 2017-09-19
rejected Nelson's attempt to impeach the verdict as the product of a juror's improper influence. Nelson's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7973 - 2017-09-19